This article is more than 5 years old. Information may no longer be current.
Advances in spinopelvic fixation may have improved correction for neuromuscular scoliosis
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Although rigid construct fixation for deformity correction outperformed non-rigid construction for deformity correction in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis at final follow-up, researchers of this recently published retrospective chart and radiographic review found rigid construct fixation was a more expensive option.
Researchers identified 80 patients who were treated between 1998 and 2012 with posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis for neuromuscular scoliosis and had a minimum 1-year follow-up. About 95% were non-ambulatory and most patients (55%) were identified as having cerebral palsy. The researchers defined non-rigid constructs as having greater than 50% sublaminar wire fixation with Galveston or iliac screw pelvic fixation, and rigid constructs were defined as having 50% or greater pedicle screw fixation with iliac or sacral alar iliac screw pelvic fixation.
Researchers noted 23 patients received non-rigid constructs and 57 patients received rigid constructs. There was no statistical difference in the pelvic obliquity or the preoperative Cobb angle between the rigid or non-rigid groups or in the immediate postoperative deformity correction.
The mean estimated cost for the rigid construct was significantly higher than the estimated cost for the non-rigid construct ($15,488 vs. $3,128), according to the study data. At final follow-up, the Cobb angle correction and pelvic obliquity was much greater in the rigid group compared with the non-rigid group.
“Loss of correction greater than 5° occurred within the non-rigid group in 65% of patients for Cobb angle and 57% for pelvic obliquity as compared with 23% and 21% within the rigid group, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). Additionally, the final pelvic obliquity progressed to at least 5° greater than the preoperative deformity for 43% (10/23) of the non-rigid group as compared with 7% (4/57) of the rigid group (P < 0.001), demonstrating that non-rigid implants were not reliably able to maintain correction and prevent progressive deformity,” the researchers wrote in the study. – by Robert Linnehan
Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts