Long-term results similar for anterior, low-profile CDA device and ACDF
SAN DIEGO — Patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion did not have any better outcomes than well-selected patients treated with cervical disc arthroplasty through 84 months follow-up, according to a presenter at the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Annual Meeting, here.
At final follow-up, the patients who underwent cervical disc arthroplasty (CDR) received the PRESTIGE LP Cervical Disc (Medtronic; Memphis, Tenn.) showed similar improvement in their Neck Disability Index, neck and arm pain and SF-36 scores to a group of patients who underwent anterior cervical disc fusion (ACDF).
“Angular motion in patients with the Prestige LP disc was well preserved at 84-month follow up,” Todd Lanman, MD, said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5586/d5586e75bcfb6e54d0fb6be19d9aa878957791de" alt=""
Todd Lanman
In the study 280 patients underwent CDR and 265 patients underwent ACDF. Patients were followed-up through 7 years.
The improvements Lanman and colleagues observed were first evident at 1.5 postoperative months and they were maintained through 84 months of follow-up.
Lanman said segmental motion was maintained postoperatively in the CDA and the implant provided biomechanical stability for the CDA cohort. – by Robert Linnehan
Reference:
Gornet MF, at al. Paper #271. Presented at: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Annual Meeting; April 15-17, 2015; San Diego.
Disclosure: Lanman reports he received miscellaneous non-income support from Medtronic and that he is a member of the speakers bureaus for Medtronic and Stryker.