April 13, 2015
1 min read
Save

Research links work productivity loss with distal radius fracture

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

LAS VEGAS — Patients who sustained a distal radius fracture reported significant work productivity loss for up to 1 year following injury, according to a presenter at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting.

“Work productivity losses are greatest in the first 6 weeks post-injury,” Gerard Slobogean, MD, MPG, FRCSC, said during his presentation. “By 3 months, the majority do not have any work productivity impairments.”

Slobogean and colleagues evaluated 53 patients (mean age: 48 years) who underwent treatment for isolated distal radius fractures for up to 1 year following the injury. All patients completed the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), DASH and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) surveys. Decreased work productivity was calculated via age- and gender-adjusted median incomes in 2008 Canadian dollars.

Overall, 38 patients (72%) remained employed throughout the course of their injury and rehabilitation. At a respective 2 weeks and 6 weeks after injury, median work productivity loss was 54% and 20%. Although this figure reached 0% at 3 months after injury, 28% and 21% of patients reported some work productivity loss at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively. On average, societal cost stemming from lost work productivity due to a distal radius fracture was estimated as $3,317 per patient, which totaled approximately 7% of the patients’ annual salary.

Although DASH and EQ-5D values significantly dropped from baseline levels (3 and 0.95, respectively) after injury, they returned to similar levels (9.9 and 0.9, respectively) at final follow-up. Most (64%) of fractures were treated without surgical intervention, though patients who were employed were more likely to have surgical intervention than those who were unemployed, according to the researchers. – by Christian Ingram

Reference:

Slobogean G, et al. Paper #580. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting. March 24-28, 2015; Las Vegas.

Disclosure: Slobogean reports no relevant financial disclosures.