January 30, 2015
1 min read
Save

Similar short-term outcomes seen in robot-assisted, conventional TKA

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Similar short-term clinical outcomes, such as reduction of mechanical axis alignment and joint-line deviation outliers, were found among patients who underwent robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty, according to study results.

From May 2012 to December 2012, researchers randomly assigned 31 patients to undergo robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 29 patients to conventional TKA. Patients had weight-bearing radiographs taken at 1-month follow-up. The researchers examined clinical outcome markers, such as postoperative Knee Society score, Knee Society function score, Oxford knee score, SF-36 score and range of motion, at 6 months. Additionally, operative times, length of hospital stay and any perioperative complications were recorded, as well.

Results showed no overall difference at 6-month follow-up in terms of clinical outcome measures. However, the robot-assisted group demonstrated higher SF-36 vitality scores, according to the researchers.

The researchers also found the conventional group had 19.4% coronal plan mechanical axis outliers and 10.3% cases with anterior femoral notching compared with the robot-assisted group. According to study results, the robot-assisted group had 3.2% joint line shift outliers vs. 20.6% in the conventional group. – by Casey Tingle

Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.