December 03, 2012
1 min read
Save

Specialists use ultrasound more efficiently to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Specialists are more cost-effective than general practitioners in using ultrasound as a confirmatory test to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome, according to this study.

“The use of diagnostic ultrasound as a first-line test for confirmation of a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is a more cost-effective strategy in the specialist population and results in improved false-negative rates in the general population despite increased cost,” John R. Fowler, MD, and colleagues stated in the study abstract.

Fowler and colleagues compared whether using ultrasound as a first-line test is more effective than using electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing or ultrasound alone in both specialists and general practitioners, according to the abstract. They created a fictional patient group and assigned each patient a random true-positive, true-negative, false-positive and false-negative ultrasound and EDX test.

Average charges for specialists included $400.30 for an initial ultrasound and $428.30 for EDX alone, while for general practitioners, the cost was an average of $562.90 for an ultrasound per patient followed by $369.50 per patient for EDX, according to the abstract.

Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.