September 13, 2010
1 min read
Save

Study finds no difference between surgical and nonsurgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture

Nilsson-Helander K. Am J Sports Med. doi: 10.1177/0363546510376052

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The authors of this study attempted to find a consensus on the optimal treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. The randomized control level 1 study, evaluated 97 patients, 79 men and 18 women, with a mean age of 41 years who had acute Achilles tendon rupture. Were randomized to receive operative or nonoperative treatment and followed for 1 year post-treatment, with a primary end point of re-rupture. Patients were evaluated using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), functional tests, and clinical examination at 6 and 12 months after injury.

Overall, they found a 12% re-re-rupture rate in the nonsurgical group and a $5 rate in the surgical group (P = .377). They wrote, “The mean 6- and 12-month ATRS were 72 and 88 points in the surgical group and 71 and 86 points in the nonsurgical group, respectively. Improvements in ATRS between 6 and 12 months were significant for both groups, with no significant between-group differences.”

They concluded that results of this study did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Furthermore, the study suggests that early mobilization is beneficial for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture whether they are treated surgically or nonsurgically.