April 01, 2008
1 min read
Save

Patellofemoral Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of 2 Posterior-Stabilized Designs

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Submitted: 11/20/06; Accepted: 4/26/07; Posted: 2/29/08

Knee complications and function were analyzed in patients with 2 different posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs, Optetrak 913 and Insall-Burstein II. Three hundred Insall-Burstein II knees with mean follow-up of 8 years (range: 5-9 years) and 300 Optetrak knees with mean follow-up of 6 years (range: 5-7 years) were studied. Lateral retinacular release was performed in 30% of Insall-Burstein II patients and 16% of Optetrak patients (P=0.001), and patellar clunk was 4% for the Insall-Burstein II prosthesis and 0.3% for the Optetrak prosthesis (P=0.003). No statistically significant differences in dislocation, fracture, or loosening rates were observed between the 2 groups.

Knee Society scores were similar in 2 groups of 50 patients brought back to the office. Mean Knee Society knee scores were 92 and 94 for the Insall-Burstein II and Optetrak groups, respectively (P>0.05), and function scores were 80 and 84 for the 2 groups, respectively (P>0.05). At midterm follow-up, Optetrak patients were less likely than Insall-Burstein II patients to require lateral retinacular release and experience patellar clunk.