September 01, 2011
3 min read
Save

High complication rate seen with reverse shoulder arthroplasty for elderly patients

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

French researchers who treated elderly patients with acute proximal humeral fractures using a standard reverse shoulder prosthesis without re-insertion of the tubercles because of patients’ osteoporosis and poor physiology found that 21% had complications, 42% were unsatisfied with the procedure and 62% had “worrying” images.

“Such results do not allow us to validate in the long term, the concept of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in recent trauma of the proximal humerus,” Jean-Francois Cazeneuve, MD, said during his presentation at the 12th EFORT Congress 2011. “Our elective indication is females, greater than 70 years old with poor physiology, major osteoporosis and for the non-dominate side.”

Cazeneuve and his team studied 37 patients who were treated with Grammont’s Delta reverse shoulder prosthesis (DePuy, Warsaw) from 1993 to 2010.

The distal part of the fifth finger could be easily inserted between the trial sphere and the polyethylene in a patient maximally relaxed with curare.
The distal part of the fifth finger could be easily inserted between the trial sphere and the polyethylene in a patient maximally relaxed with curare.

Images: Cazeneuve JF

“In 1993, we moved to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, because of the difficulty or impossibility to have an efficient re-fixation of the tubercles with a classic topical device in cases of poor physiology and rate osteoporosis,” Cazeneuve said.

The patients had a mean age of 75 years, and many had “frail and poor conditions,” according to Cazeneuve. The investigators used the Constant and Murley scoring system to assess clinical results and the Valenti and Nerot scoring system to evaluate notching. The patients had a mean follow-up of 7.3 years.

Clinical outcomes

There were eight complications including two reflex sympathetic dystrophies, three early dislocations, two deep infections and one case of aseptic loosening that occurred at 12-year follow-up.

The team observed a decrease in the Constant and Murley score between 2-year follow-up and the last follow-up.

“We observed that 42% of the patients were unsatisfied because the results left them unable to use eating utensils to dress independently, to perform activities necessary for personal hygiene in cases where the dominant side was involved, and the patient dropped into dependency,” Cazeneuve said. “The functional results were never equal to the pre-broken state.”

The only case of aseptic loosening of the base plate with a broken screw at 12-year follow-up leading to a prosthetic revision with implantation of a classic meta-glenoid was seen because of a fair bone stock and an efficient primary grip after impaction.
The only case of aseptic loosening of the base plate with a broken screw at 12-year follow-up leading to a prosthetic revision with implantation of a classic meta-glenoid was seen because of a fair bone stock and an efficient primary grip after impaction.

The polyethylene removed did not show a lot of wear, according to investigators.
The polyethylene removed did not show a lot of wear, according to investigators.

The mean Constant and Murley score decreased from 55 at 2 years to 52 at the last revision “because of an augmentation of the pain and a diminution of the strength, which represented 67% of the mean score for the injured side,” according to the study abstract.

Radiologic outcomes

Radiologic findings showed 2 mm complete glenoid borders in two male patients with 42-mm diameters of the sphere at 4- and 8-year follow-ups. The investigators also found 14 inferior spurs that occurred at a mean of 2.5 years. These were stable after emergence and did not impact patients’ function or show progression on radiographs.

Inferior spurs appeared at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years and were stable after emergence without functional impact.
Inferior spurs appeared at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years and were stable after emergence without functional impact.

Eleven notches were stable (52%) without worrisome humeral images (impingement between the humeral component and the pillar of the glenoid or micro-movements of the lower screw).
Eleven notches were stable (52%) without worrisome humeral images (impingement between the humeral component and the pillar of the glenoid or micro-movements of the lower screw).

Ten patients were progressive with four proximal humeral bone losses and six radiolucent lines (polyethylene disease or osteonecrosis related to devascularization because of trauma or the surgical technique).
Ten patients were progressive with four proximal humeral bone losses and six radiolucent lines (polyethylene disease or osteonecrosis related to devascularization because of trauma or the surgical technique).

The investigators noted that 56% of patients developed scapular notching that appeared before 2-year follow-up, and the notches became more severe with longer follow-up. In all, the researchers pinpointed two patterns of notches — 11 isolated and 10 with “worrying” humeral images, which included four cases with medial proximal humeral bone loss and six with medial bone-cement interface borders. Cazeneuve noted that these could be due to polyethylene disease or osteonecrosis related to the trauma or surgical technique.

The team also observed 48 abnormal radiographic images. When they crossed the clinical and radiological results, they found four notches with worrying humeral images. These cases had a mean Constant score of 41. – by Renee Blisard

Reference:
  • Cazeneuve J, CazeneuveJF, Hassan Y, Hilaneh A. Does reverse shoulder arthroplasty work in acute proximal humeral fractures? Paper #131. Presented at the 12th EFORT Congress 2011. June 1-4. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Jean-Francois Cazeneuve, MD, can be reached at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Centre, Centre Hospitalier, 02000-Laon, France; email: jean-francois.cazeneuve@ch-laon.fr.
  • Disclosure: Cazeneuve has no relevant financial disclosures.