Low adherence to anti-VEGF injections results in declining mean visual acuity
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Key takeaways:
- Visual acuity increased by 3 letters on average at year 1.
- By year 6, annual decreases led to a net loss of 4.6 letters.
Adherence to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections may be challenging for some patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, putting them at risk for poor vision outcomes, according to research published in Ophthalmology Science.
“This study utilized statistical models to evaluate predictors of [visual acuity] change and assess the impact of baseline characteristics and the number of anti-VEGF injections received on vision outcomes and investigated long-term treatment patterns,” Charles C. Wykoff, MD, PhD, from Retina Consultants of Texas, and colleagues wrote.
In a retrospective, multicenter study, researchers used the IRIS Registry to identify 254,655 eyes from 226,767 patients with neovascular AMD who received intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Of those, 160,423 eyes had visual acuity data.
At year 1, researchers reported a mean increase in visual acuity of 3 ETDRS letters, with annual decreases leading to a net loss of 4.6 letters by year 6. Those with longer follow-ups had better visual acuity at baseline and subsequent visits. The mean number of injections plateaued between 4.6 to 4.2 in years 3 to 6, dropping from 7.2 in year 1 and 5.6 in year 2. Further, treatment was discontinued in 38.8% of eyes and switched in 32.3%.
After adjusting for baseline differences, Wykoff and colleagues determined that for each additional injection completed, there was a resulting 0.68 letter improvement between baseline and year 1, indicating that multiple injections may be clinically meaningful.
More than half (58.5%) of participants lost 10 letters or more in visual acuity at least once throughout the follow-up period.
“Overall, these findings suggest that most patients with [neovascular AMD] may find it difficult to adhere to the requirement for frequent intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and could therefore be at risk of experiencing poor vision outcomes,” Wykoff and colleagues wrote. “New therapies, including those with different modes of action and/or new routes of administration, which safely reduce treatment burden by extending the duration between retreatments while maintaining optimal efficacy outcomes, could result in improved visual outcomes for patients in routine clinical practice.”