Fact checked byHeather Biele

Read more

September 05, 2023
1 min read
Save

Twice-daily pilocarpine HCl safe, effective in treating presbyopia

Fact checked byHeather Biele
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • A greater proportion of participants in the twice-daily pilocarpine HCl group had near-vision improvements.
  • The most common adverse event was headache, which was reported in 8.8% of the pilocarpine group.

Pilocarpine hydrochloride 1.25% administered twice daily yielded statistically greater near-vision improvements than a control vehicle, while maintaining the safety profile of once-daily administration, according to research.

“In this randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-masked, parallel-group, phase 3 study, the primary and secondary endpoints demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvements in near vision with pilocarpine HCl 1.25% twice daily than with vehicle, without compromising distance acuity,” Shane Kannarr, OD, from Kannarr Eye Care in Pittsburg, Kansas, and colleagues wrote in the American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Presbyopia
Researchers reported that twice-daily pilocarpine HCl 1.25% demonstrated statistically significant improvements in presbyopia vs. control vehicle.
Image: Adobe Stock.

To investigate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of twice-daily pilocarpine hydrochloride 1.25% vs. control vehicle, researchers enrolled 230 individuals aged 40 to 55 years with evidence of presbyopia. Participants were instructed to administer drops in both eyes 6 hours apart for 14 days.

Kannarr and colleagues examined the proportion of participants that gained three or more lines in mesopic and photopic, high-contrast, binocular distance-corrected near visual acuity on day 14, 3 hours following the second dose, with no more than a five-letter loss in mesopic/photopic corrected distance visual acuity with the same refractive correction. Researchers also monitored participants for treatment-emergent adverse events.

According to results, a significantly higher proportion of participants in the pilocarpine group achieved both primary and secondary efficacy endpoints than in the vehicle group, with a between treatment difference of 27.3% (P < .01) and 26.4% (P < .01), respectively.

The most common adverse response was headache, which was reported in 8.8% of the pilocarpine group and 3.4% of the vehicle group.

“In summary, the primary and secondary endpoints of this study demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvements in near vision with pilocarpine HCl 1.25% twice daily than with vehicle, without compromising distance acuity,” Kannarr and colleagues wrote. “Moreover, systemic accumulation was minimal, and the safety profile of pilocarpine HCl 1.25% twice daily was consistent with that of pilocarpine HCl 1.25% once daily.”