Fact checked byHeather Biele

Read more

April 14, 2023
1 min read
Save

Acanthamoeba keratitis risk greater with reusable vs. daily disposable contact lens use

Fact checked byHeather Biele
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • The odds of developing Acanthamoeba keratitis were three times higher with reusable soft lenses vs. daily disposables.
  • Daily disposable lens users can minimize risk by adhering to safe use guidelines.
Perspective from Justina R. Assaad, OD, FAAO

The risk for Acanthamoeba keratitis increases threefold with reusable contact lens wear compared with daily disposable lens wear, highlighting the importance of safe use guidelines, according to research in Ophthalmology.

“The widespread use of [daily disposable (DD)] lenses is both because of convenience and because data suggest that the risk for severe microbial keratitis with vision loss, including that caused by Acanthamoeba, is probably reduced for DD compared with reusable contact lens wear, although this has not been confirmed for either predominantly bacterial or Acanthamoeba keratitis,” Nicole Carnt, PhD, associate professor and deputy director of research at the University of New South Wales School of Optometry and Vision Science in Australia, and colleagues wrote.

contact lens
The risk for AK was found to be greater with reusable contact lens wear. Image: Adobe Stock

To better understand risk factors for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) in DD and daily wear (DW) reusable contact lens (CL) users, Carnt and colleagues conducted a case-control study of 83 AK cases and 122 controls from an accident and emergency department serving Southeast England. Researchers collected data via self-administered questionnaires.

According to results, 20 AK cases (24%) and 66 controls (54%) reported DD use. After adjusting for potential confounders, researchers reported the odds of AK were higher with DW reusable soft lenses (OR = 3.84) and gas-permeable lenses (OR = 4.56) compared with DD lenses.

In a subset analysis of DD users, AK was linked with less frequent follow-up visits with a lens professional (OR = 10.12), lens reuse (OR = 5.41), showering in lenses (OR = 3.29) and overnight lens wear (OR = 3.93), all of which were considered modifiable risk factors.

Researchers also reported that up to 62% of AK cases could be prevented by switching from reusable soft to DD lenses, according to population attributable risk percentage calculations.

“These results can be expected to encourage more CL users to switch from

reusable CLs, with their associated storage and solution risks, and to practice safer use of DD lenses (without reuse, overnight wear or contamination by water),” Carnt and colleagues concluded. “Safe CL use could be improved by the inclusion of clear risk avoidance data on lens packaging by manufacturers and advice in public swimming pools on water avoidance while using lenses.”