Age, systemic factors linked to longitudinal trends in IOP levels
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
A combination of age and systemic factors, including gender and various serum values, were significantly associated with a longitudinal change in IOP, according to a study published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
“The current results suggested that IOP might be suppressed by changing life habitat, such as increasing the intake of foods containing [calcium] and maintaining good biliary tract functions,” Ryo Asaoka, MD, PhD, of the department of ophthalmology at the University of Tokyo, and colleagues wrote. “However, these are not the results of intervention. A further study would be needed to investigate the effect of changing life habitat on IOP trend.”
In a longitudinal study investigating the effects of systemic factors on change in IOP, Asaoka and colleagues analyzed 20,909 eyes from 10,471 participants (mean age, 52.7 years; 65.9% men) without glaucoma from a large-scale health screening cohort at Seirei Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Medicine in Japan.
Participants were examined based on several systemic factors including age, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, smoking, red and white blood cell counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, total protein, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, triglyceride, LDL-C, HDL-C, HbA1c, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, uric acid, C-reactive protein and IOP. Data from the health examinations were collected from May 2012 to March 2021.
Researchers reported a decrease in IOP by –0.084 mm Hg per year. In addition, older age and higher aspartate aminotransferase, hemoglobin, platelet and calcium values were associated with a significant decrease in IOP (P < .05). Conversely, alanine aminotransferase, white blood cell count, red blood cell count and female sex were associated with a significant increase in IOP (P < .05).
After acknowledging the limitations of their study, which included noncontact tonometry readings and lack of diversity in the study population, Asaoka and colleagues wrote that “further investigation is expected in the future, as evoked by this study.”