Potassium monitoring device saves money, increases quality of life in patients on dialysis
ORLANDO — Using a real-time potassium monitoring device in patients on hemodialysis saves more money than the usual care and increases quality of life, according to a presenter at ASN Kidney Week.
Further, investigators found the device prevents hyperkalemic events among patients on hemodialysis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79f09/79f093c0eda186b6e39eb2b28a24c597d2704580" alt="patient speaking with a doctor"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42575/4257531a7ff84248bd1edb7eaf94738218723532" alt=""
Ryan J. Bamforth, MS, MSC, and colleagues compared the cost and quality of life linked with use of a real-time potassium monitoring device in patients on hemodialysis vs. usual care. Investigators designed a decision analytic microsimulation model from the point of view of the United States health care payer with the intention of conducting a cost-utility analysis.
The analysis focused on the monthly break-even cost per patient and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing the two interventions, including costs related to hyperkalemic events and dialysis. Researchers derived utility estimates for patients on hemodialysis from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Additionally, researchers applied a 25% reduction in hyperkalemic events to the intervention scenario as a baseline effectiveness estimate.
Analyses revealed the monthly break-even cost per patient in the base case scenario was $689.56. Further, the real-time potassium monitoring device provided 0.04 additional quality-adjusted life-years. Researchers noted that adjusting the effectiveness estimates between a reduction of hyperkalemic events between 10% and 50%, the monthly break-even costs ranged from $265.36 to $1,387.90.
“Basically, the takeaway result is that if we were to implement this continuous potassium monitoring device, if were to avoid 10% and 15% of all the hyperkalemic events in this population, this scenario would be both less expensive for the system and individuals would live longer quality-adjusted life-years,” Bamforth told Healio.