Fact checked byMindy Valcarcel, MS

Read more

September 16, 2024
1 min read
Save

Durvalumab regimen improves outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Fact checked byMindy Valcarcel, MS
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Durvalumab in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting conferred benefit in EFS and OS.
  • Use of durvalumab did not increase grade 3 or grade 4 treatment-related adverse events.

Use of durvalumab before and after radical cystectomy improved outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, according to results of the randomized phase 3 NIAGARA trial.

The regimen significantly extended EFS and OS, findings presented at ESMO Congress showed.

The durvalumab regimen improved EFS by infographic
Data derived from Powles TB, et al. Abstract LBA5. Presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; Sept. 13-17, 2024; Barcelona, Spain.

Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are eligible for cisplatin often receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy.

Durvalumab (Imfinzi, AstraZeneca) is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to PD-L1.

Researchers conducted the NIAGARA trial to assess use of durvalumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by radical cystectomy and adjuvant durvalumab.

The analysis included 1,063 patients with muscle-invasive disease, defined as cT2-T4aN0/1M0.

Researchers assigned 533 patients to 1,500 mg neoadjuvant durvalumab IV every 3 weeks plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by radical cystectomy, followed by adjuvant therapy with 1,500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks for eight cycles. The other 530 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by radical cystectomy.

EFS and pathologic complete response served as dual primary endpoints. OS served as a secondary endpoint.

At ESMO, researchers presented EFS and OS results from a pre-planned interim analysis.

Median follow-up was 42.3 months (range, 0.03-61.3).

A higher percentage of patients assigned durvalumab achieved 24-month EFS (67.8% vs. 59.8%; HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.82). A 24-month OS analysis also favored the durvalumab group (82.2% vs. 75.2%; HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93).

The majority of patients in the durvalumab group and no-durvalumab group underwent radical cystectomy (88% vs. 83.2%), and 383 of 469 patients assigned the durvalumab regimen began adjuvant durvalumab.

A similar percentage of patients in the durvalumab and no-durvalumab groups developed grade 3 or grade 4 treatment-related adverse events (40.6% vs. 40.9%) and died due to treatment-related causes (0.6% in each group).

Adverse events prompted 8% of patients to discontinue adjuvant durvalumab.