Read more

July 15, 2022
3 min read
Save

Preoperative MRI shows benefit in men with prostate cancer, but use varies by race, region

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Preoperative MRI led to significantly fewer postoperative complications among men undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer, according to study results.

Perspective from Samuel C. Haywood, MD

However, findings of the population-based retrospective study, published in Journal of Urology, showed marked variations in use of preoperative MRI according to geographic region, as well as race.

Odds ratio with preoperative MRI for men with prostate cancer

Rationale and methods

“Large academic centers have dramatically increased the use of prostate MRI in recent years and have achieved good outcomes both pre-biopsy and pre-surgery using MRI,” Alexander P. Cole, MD, assistant professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School and associate surgeon in the division of urological surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, told Healio. “The problem is that studying MRIs is expensive, time-consuming and very technique- and radiologist-dependent. We did not know how good the outcomes are when we step back and look at the country as a whole, so we wanted to assess how MRIs are being used throughout the country and to assess their association with surgical outcomes.”

Alexander Cole
Alexander P. Cole

Cole and colleagues used SEER-Medicare linked data to identify 19,369 men (mean age, 70.2 years) undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer between 2003 and 2016. They characterized the proportion of men receiving preoperative MRI during each year and each hospital referral region, and then performed a two-stage instrumental variable analysis to assess the association of preoperative MRI with margin status, surgical complications and additional cancer-directed therapies.

Key findings

The proportion of men who underwent preoperative MRI increased from 2.9% to 28.2% during the study period and varied from zero to 28.8% across the different hospital referral regions.

Results of the two-stage instrumental variable analysis showed associations of preoperative MRI with lower odds of positive surgical margin (OR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97) and lower odds of blood transfusions at 30 days (OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83) and 90 days (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), but higher odds of further treatment (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32-1.7). Of note, almost twice as many white men underwent an MRI before surgery compared with Black men.

“MRI provides surgeons information about the prostate size, shape and the location of the cancer within the prostate gland,” Cole said. “Regarding the uptake of MRI, we know that this is an important tool for improving cancer outcomes but when we looked at the uptake of MRI, we found that the chance of receiving a preoperative MRI increased during the study period, but also varied substantially from region to region and according to race in the United States.”

Implications

This study supports what many surgeons have thought for a long time: Preoperative MRI helps improve surgical outcomes, Cole said.

“This makes sense because for most cancers, imaging is a critical tool for planning surgery. Prostate cancer was one of the few cancers where surgeons would proceed with surgery simply based on an exam and biopsy without having cross-sectional imaging of the organ they are removing,” he added. “If we have the option of an MRI before surgery, it probably will help a surgeon perform this surgery. What is also striking in this paper is that the chance of getting MRI varies significantly, so we still have a long way to go in terms of making sure men can receive this test.”

Cole said there is a lot of ongoing, exciting research in this area.

“These types of high-tech diagnostic tests, like prostate MRI, along with other forms of advanced imaging and molecular testing are routinely used in high-resource settings,” he said. “But we have a long way to go in terms of disseminating these tools in a way that is equitable and fair. This is where a lot of the next steps are going to be focused — we need to address the quality gap that we have identified in this paper.”

References:

For more information:

Alexander P. Cole, MD, can be reached at apcole@bwh.harvard.edu.