Benefit-risk ratio of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab not positive in bladder cancer subset
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
SAN FRANCISCO — Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not demonstrate a positive benefit-risk ratio compared with pembrolizumab and placebo as first-line therapy for certain patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, study results showed.
The findings, presented at ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, showed no new safety signals with the lenvatinib-pembrolizumab combination and — with pembrolizumab monotherapy — antitumor activity similar to that observed in prior studies of patients ineligible for cisplatin or any platinum-based chemotherapy.
“First-line pembrolizumab remains a standard of care in the United States for patients with who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status and, in Europe, for patients who are cisplatin-ineligible and have tumors that express PD-L1 with a [combined positive score] of 10 or greater,” Yohann Loriot, MD, PhD, oncologist in the department of cancer medicine at Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France, said during a presentation.
In the phase 1b/phase 2 KEYNOTE-146 trial, the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck) demonstrated antitumor activity and acceptable safety in combination with the multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib (Lenvima, Eisai). The randomized, multicenter phase 3 LEAP-011 trial evaluated first-line pembrolizumab with or without lenvatinib among 487 cisplatin-ineligible adults with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score of 10 or greater or were ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.
Researchers randomly assigned patients to 200 mg IV pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for as many as 35 cycles with 20 mg oral lenvatinib (n = 245) or placebo (n = 242). The groups had similar baseline characteristics with regard to median age (74 years vs. 73 years), percentage of patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (80% vs. 80.2%).
PFS per RECIST version 1.1 and OS served as primary endpoints. Objective response rate served as a key secondary endpoint.
An independent data monitoring committee assessed safety data at 3-month intervals and, based on the data presented at the symposium, recommended the investigators stop enrollment.
Median follow-up was 5.9 months in the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib group and 7 months for the pembrolizumab-placebo group.
Results showed median PFS according to blinded independent central review of 4.5 months (95% CI, 4-6) with pembrolizumab-lenvatinib and 4 months (95% CI, 2.7-5.4) with pembrolizumab-placebo (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.72-1.14). The addition of lenvatinib resulted in median OS of 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.1-15.1) compared with 12.9 months (95% CI, 9.8-17.8) for those who received pembrolizumab and placebo (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87-1.48).
The combination-therapy group had a lower median duration of response (12.8 months vs. 19.3 months) and a numerically higher ORR (33.1% vs. 28.9%).
A safety assessment of 483 treated patients showed the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib group had a higher rate of any-grade (87.6% vs. 69%) and grade 3 or higher (51% vs. 27.3) treatment-related adverse events. Six patients in the combination-therapy group and one patient in the pembrolizumab-placebo group died of a treatment-related adverse event.
The most common treatment-related adverse events in the combination therapy group included proteinuria (37.8% vs. 18.6% with pembrolizumab and placebo), hypothyroidism (36.5% vs. 7%) and hypertension (34.9% vs. 7%). Clinically significant events related to lenvatinib included hypertension (41.9%), proteinuria (41.5%) and hypothyroidism (36.9%).