Read more

December 13, 2021
3 min watch
Save

VIDEO: Study provides real-world data on treatment sequencing in breast cancer subset

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Megan Kruse, MD, a breast medical oncologist at Cleveland Clinic, spoke with Healio about results from her research on real-world sequential and non-sequential use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in a subset of breast cancer patients.

The results were presented at San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

“This idea for research came about, really, from a clinical question that I think a lot of medical oncologists think about each day, which is what to do for patients who have been treated in the first-line, metastatic, [hormone receptor]-positive HER2-negative breast cancer setting with a CKD4/6 inhibitor and some sort of endocrine therapy,” Kruse said. “And we really struggle knowing what to do next, because there are not great studies that inform a sequencing choice.”

Through examining real-world experience among these patients, she said researchers found that many patients who had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors continued receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors as second- or third-line treatments.

Additionally, the researchers found that patients who were sensitive to combination treatment with endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors as a first- or second-line treatment had improved PFS when they received CDK4/6 inhibitors as a subsequent treatment compared with those who did not receive later treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Among patients who did not have good outcomes with a combined treatment of endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6, “it seems like providers are more likely to switch them to a different type of therapy,” such as chemotherapy, Kruse said.

“I think that’s the main takeaway, that if you get a good response with your first exposure to this combination therapy, you’re more likely to have a response in the next sequential line of therapy,” Kruse said. “But we don’t really know all the details involved in that, particularly which CDK4/6 inhibitor to use — is there an optimal way to sequence the drugs within this class — we really have no idea. The granularity of our data was not able to parce out those very specific differences, and I think those are going to be really relevant as providers make decisions moving forward.”