Read more

February 11, 2022
2 min read
Save

Most indeterminate thyroid nodules diagnosed with repeat fine-needle aspiration

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Repeat fine-needle aspiration can diagnose more than half of thyroid nodules initially classified as indeterminate, but diagnosis rates are less than 50% with nodules smaller than 0.5 cm or larger than 1 cm, according to study data.

Perspective from Elizabeth H. Holt, MD, PhD

“In this study, the definitive diagnosis rate of the second ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules was 51.8%,” Ming Yao, MMed, of the department of radiology at Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine in Shijiazhuang, China, and colleagues wrote in a study published in the Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. “In other words, half of the nodules that could not be given a definitive diagnosis by the first ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration were given one by the second ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, thereby benefiting all these patients. However, the detection rate of different size nodules is not the same.”

Rate of definitive diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules with repeat fine needle aspiration
A higher proportion of thyroid nodules between 0.5 cm and 1 cm in diameter were definitively diagnosed with repeat fine needle aspiration than nodules less than 0.5 cm or larger than 1 cm. Data were derived from Zhao N, et al. J Clin Ultrasound. 2022;doi:10.1002/jcu.23119.

Researchers conducted a second fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in 143 adults with 162 thyroid nodules at Hebei Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine from 2016 to 2017. The second FNA was conducted 3 months after an initial indeterminate FNA. Participants were included in the analysis if they had no tumor-related treatment between the two procedures and if they eventually underwent surgery producing pathology results. The nodules were divided by size into a small group with a diameter of less than 0.5 cm (n = 26), a medium group with a nodule diameter between 0.5 cm and 1 cm (n = 76) and a large group with a diameter larger than 1 cm (n = 60).

Of the 162 nodules in the study, 100 were confirmed to be malignant. In the small nodule group, 19 of 26 nodules were malignant, 42 of 76 nodules were malignant in the medium group, and 39 of 60 were malignant in the large group.

In the small group, eight of 26 nodules were diagnosed definitively after a second FNA, of which six were malignant. The other 18 nodules were not diagnosed definitively. Pathology results showed 13 of those 18 nodules were malignant.

In the medium group, 51 of 76 nodules were diagnosed definitively after repeat FNA, of which 34 were malignant. The other 25 modules were not diagnosed after the second FNA. Eight of those 25 nodules were malignant in pathology results.

In the large group, 25 of 60 nodules were diagnosed after a second FNA, with 19 diagnosed as malignant. The remaining 35 nodules were not diagnosed after repeat FNA, of which 20 were malignant in pathology results.

Overall, 51.8% of nodules were diagnosed after a second FNA. The diagnosis rate of nodules between 0.5 cm and 1 cm in diameter was 67.1%, significantly higher than the rate of 30.8% for nodules smaller than 0.5 cm and 41.7% for those larger than 1 cm (P < .05 for both).

Diagnosis accuracy after a second FNA was 95.2% overall. There was no significant difference in diagnosis accuracy between the three nodule size groups.

“A second ultrasound-guided FNA is recommended for thyroid nodules with diameter between 0.5 cm and 1 cm that cannot be definitively diagnosed by an initial ultrasound-guided FNA,” the researchers wrote. “However, the diagnostic efficacy of a second ultrasound-guided FNA appears to be low for nodules with a diameter less than 0.5 cm or greater than 1 cm, so it is recommended that further treatment of such nodules should be considered in line with clinical practice.”