Issue: January 2019
January 24, 2019
7 min read
Save

Cholesterol guideline updated with newer medications, more personalized risk calculation

Issue: January 2019
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

New recommendations from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, American Diabetes Association and nine other societies advise a stepped approach to cholesterol management, including use of statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors for patients with prior cardiovascular disease at very high risk for another event.

“The most intensive LDL lowering is reserved for those patients at the very highest risk,” Neil J. Stone, MD, the Robert Bonow, MD, professor of medicine and preventive medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and vice chair of the writing committee, said during a press conference at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions in November, where the new guidelines were unveiled.

The new guidance also calls for more personalized risk assessments than outlined in the previous version, which was published in 2013.

Of note, an LDL target of less than 70 mg/dL is recommended for certain high-risk patients. Targets had been eliminated in the 2013 guidelines.

“There is no ideal target for LDL in the general population, but in principle, lower is better,” AHA president Ivor Benjamin, MD, FAHA, director of the Cardiovascular Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin, said during the press conference.

Neil J. Stone

The guideline emphasizes management of cholesterol on a case-by-case basis and encourages patient-provider discussions of risk before deciding on a treatment plan.

“As we move into an era where care is personalized, how we prevent and treat heart disease differs patient by patient,” Richard Kovacs, MD, FACC, the Q.E. and Sally Russell Professor of Cardiology at Indiana University School of Medicine, clinical director of the Krannert Institute of Cardiology and vice president of the American College of Cardiology (ACC), said during the press conference. “These guidelines give us the tools we need to do that.”

The Pooled Cohort Equation from the 2013 guidelines remains as the recommended tool with which to estimate CVD risk.

“This is the most widely validated risk score in the contemporary U.S. population,” Stone said here. “The important point to remember is that the risk estimate should begin the risk discussion.”

PAGE BREAK

10 take-home messages

The guideline, written by Scott M. Grundy, MD, PhD, FAHA, director of the Center for Human Nutrition, chairman of the department of clinical nutrition and director of the Clinical and Translational Research Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center, and colleagues, features 10 important take-home messages:

  • A lifetime of heart-healthy lifestyle should be emphasized for all patients.
  • Patients with clinical atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) should be prescribed a high-intensity statin or maximally tolerated statin therapy for LDL reduction.
  • Patients with ASCVD at very high risk, defined as multiple CVD events or one CVD event and multiple high-risk characteristics, should be considered for nonstatin therapy if statin therapy cannot achieve an LDL target of less than 70 mg/dL. Ezetimibe should be tried first; if the LDL target is still not achieved, after a cost discussion, a PCSK9 inhibitor may be considered.
  • Patients with LDL 190 mg/dL or more should be prescribed high-intensity statin therapy regardless of risk; high-risk patients with diabetes should be prescribed high-intensity statin therapy with a goal of reducing LDL by at least 50%.
  • In patients with diabetes aged 40 to 75 years with LDL at least 70 mg/dL, moderate-intensity statin therapy should be started regardless of 10-year ASCVD risk.
  • Richard Kovacs
  • Regarding adults aged 40 to 75 years being considered for statin therapy for primary prevention, a clinician-patient risk discussion should occur before commencing statin therapy. The discussion should include risk factors, risk-enhancing factors, potential benefits of lifestyle measures and statin therapy, potential for adverse events and drug-drug interactions, costs and patient preferences.
  • For adults without diabetes aged 40 to 75 years with LDL 70 mg/dL or higher, with 10-year ASCVD risk of at least 7.5%, a moderate-intensity statin regimen is recommended if the risk discussion favors it. If risk status is uncertain, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring can be used to improve specificity. If statin therapy is prescribed, the goal should be LDL reduction of at least 30% (at least 50% if 10-year atherosclerotic CVD risk is 20% or more).
  • For those with 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% to 19.9%, risk-enhancing factors can be used to further refine whether statin therapy should be initiated. Risk-enhancing factors include family history of premature ASCVD, persistent LDL of at least 160 mg/dL, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, preeclampsia, premature menopause, chronic inflammatory disorders, belonging to a high-risk race or ethnicity, persistent elevated triglycerides (at least 175 mg/dL), and, if measured, elevated apolipoprotein B, elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ankle-brachial index less than 0.9 and lipoprotein(a) 50 mg/dL or higher.
  • For those for whom risk-enhancing factors do not produce a refined risk assessment, consider measuring CAC. Statin therapy should be initiated in patients with CAC score 100 Agatston units or more, should be considered in patients with CAC score 1 to 99 Agatston units and should not be initiated in patients with a CAC score of 0 unless they are current smokers, have diabetes or have a family history of premature ASCVD.
  • After initiation of lipid-lowering therapies, assess adherence and response to medication and lifestyle measures at 4 to 12 weeks, then every 3 to 12 months thereafter.
PAGE BREAK

The guideline has 26 class I recommendations, 29 class IIa recommendations, 14 class IIb recommendations and three class III recommendations, Sidney C. Smith Jr., MD, FAHA, FESC, FACP, MACC, professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, past president of the AHA and the World Heart Federation and a member of the writing committee, said during the press conference.

“That is a lot to read, so I am telling people to know the class I and class III recommendations, then move on from there,” he said. “Understand that the guidelines are inclusive of the science we have learned in the last 5 years.” – by Erik Swain

Disclosures: All members of the writing committee, Benjamin and Kovacs report no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the guideline for a list of the reviewers’ relevant financial disclosures.