September 05, 2017
2 min read
Save

MrOS: Vertebral fracture rates comparable in people with, without diabetes

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The prevalence and incidence of vertebral fractures do not appear to be higher in adults with type 2 diabetes than in adults without diabetes; however, greater spine areal bone mineral density may be associated with a lower risk among both groups, study data show.

Perspective from

Nicola Napoli, MD, PhD, of the unit of endocrinology and diabetes, department of medicine at the Universitá Campus Bio-Medico di Roma in Italy, and colleagues evaluated data from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men study (MrOS) on 5,554 men (mean age, 73.6 years) with (n = 875) or without type 2 diabetes to determine whether the prevalence and incidence of vertebral fractures are higher in those with diabetes. Two percent of participants without diabetes and 2.2% with diabetes were prescribed anti-osteoporosis treatment.

Overall, 7% of participants with diabetes and 7.7% without diabetes had prevalent vertebral fractures, and 4.4% of participants with diabetes and 4.5% without diabetes had incident vertebral fractures.

The estimated association between diabetes and vertebral fractures increased after adjustment for areal BMD (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.78-1.4) and volumetric BMD (OR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.89-1.88); however, the increases did not reach statistical significance. No difference was found between the two groups for risk for incident vertebral fractures.

A lower risk for prevalent vertebral fracture was associated with higher spine areal BMD in participants with diabetes (OR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.63) and without diabetes (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.5-0.88); the risk for incident vertebral fracture was also lower with higher spine areal BMD in diabetes (OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.41-0.6) and no diabetes (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.88). Similar results were observed for volumetric BMD. – by Amber Cox

Disclosures: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.