February 16, 2017
4 min read
Save

Hair analysis may identify Cushing’s syndrome

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The use of a hair analysis to measure cortisol levels may be an effective initial or supportive test for signaling Cushing’s syndrome, according to recent findings published in Endocrine.

Perspective from

“It can be difficult and time-consuming to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome,” Mihail Zilbermint, MD, an endocrinologist at NIH’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Human Health and Development, told Endocrine Today. “Diagnosis could require any of a combination of these tests — 24-hour free urine cortisol monitoring, an overnight dexamethasone-suppression test and measurement of late-night salivary cortisol. Cortisol levels may change daily, so tests may need to be repeated. Moreover, if Cushing’s syndrome is not diagnosed and treated, the patient’s risk for morbidity and mortality increases. Having an easy-to-use, accurate means to diagnose cortisol levels from hair samples — as an initial or supportive tests — could ease the burden of a complex diagnostic process, and perhaps increase diagnostic speed and accuracy.”

Mihail Zilbermint
Mihail Zilbermint

Zilbermint and colleagues evaluated 36 adults (mean age, 26.5 years; 75% women; 75% white) to determine the effectiveness of a hair analysis over 16 months for evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome.

Researchers collected 3-cm hair samples closest to the scalp that were cut into 1-cm segments (proximal, medial and distal) to assess cortisol levels. The hair samples were compared with testing done within the previous 2 months of the evaluation.

Overall, 30 participants had Cushing’s syndrome, and the remaining served as controls.

Midnight serum cortisol (P < .001), early morning cortisol (P = .02), urinary free cortisol corrected for body surface area (P < .001) and 17-hydroxysteroids corrected for creatinine (P < .001) were greater in participants with Cushing’s syndrome compared with controls.

Participants with Cushing’s syndrome had higher proximal hair cortisol values compared with the control group (P = .003), whereas the differences for medial, distal and average segments did not reach statistical significance. The proximal 1-cm hair had the highest cortisol level in 69.4% of all participants and 73.3% of participants with Cushing’s syndrome.

There were positive associations between proximal hair cortisol levels and urinary free cortisol corrected for body surface area (P = .005), midnight serum cortisol (P = .03) and 17-hydroxysteroids corrected for creatinine (P = .06) in the whole study population. Similarly, positive associations were found between proximal hair cortisol levels and urinary free cortisol corrected for body surface area (P = .009), midnight serum cortisol (P = .03) and 17-hydroxysteroids corrected for creatinine (P = .07) in participants with Cushing’s syndrome.

“Cortisol levels of hair samples taken from within 1 cm of the scalp corresponded closely with levels of cortisol detected in a standard test of urinary cortisol and late night serum cortisol,” Zilbermint told Endocrine Today. “Our results need to be confirmed, but they support further investigations into using the most proximal 1 cm of hair as an initial or supportive diagnostic test for Cushing’s syndrome.”

Zilbermint added that replication of the findings using a larger population would be a “good first step for future research.”

“Also, many factors are known to degrade hair cortisol levels — among them shampoo and ultraviolet light,” he said. “So we also need more work looking at how to consistently obtain accurate cortisol data from hair samples.” – by Amber Cox

For more information:

Mihail Zilbermint, MD, can be reached at mihail.zilbermint@nih.gov.

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.