Physical activity less protective against type 2 diabetes in those more genetically predisposed
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
The protective effect of physical activity against type 2 diabetes is weaker among people with higher genetic predisposition for the disease, according to research published in Diabetologia.
“The results from our study suggest the extent of protection is weakest among those with a high level of genetic risk for type 2 diabetes, and specifically, a high level of genetic risk for insulin resistance,” Yann C. Klimentidis, PhD, of the University of Arizona, told Endocrine Today.
Yann C. Klimentidis
“Although this area of research is still in its infancy, prevention and treatment measures for type-2 diabetes could eventually be more precisely tailored to an individual’s genetic profile,” he added.
Klimentidis and colleagues from the institution conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the relationships between physical activity, diabetes incidence and genetic susceptibility.
The investigators used data from 8,101 self-identified white men and women aged 45 to 64 years who participated in the multicenter, prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study; there were 821 incident type 2 diabetes cases within this group.
The researchers used the Baecke physical activity questionnaire, with a focus on the sport and exercise components of physical activity, to evaluate activity level.
They examined interactions between activity and: 65 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with type 2 diabetes; a genetic risk score (GRS) comprising all 65 SNPs; two GRSs comprised of SNPs involved in insulin resistance and insulin secretion; and GRSs for fasting insulin and fasting glucose.
The interaction observed between physical activity and the type 2 diabetes GRS (P for interaction=.016) suggested a weaker protective effect of physical activity in people at higher genetic risk, according to the researchers.
Based on the interactions seen with the insulin resistance GRS (P for interaction=.046) and the fasting insulin GRS (P for interaction=.042), the overall type 2 diabetes GRS interaction more likely occurs through genetic susceptibility to insulin resistance than insulin secretion, according to the researchers. This interaction was more pronounced in women (P for interaction=.0025) than in men (P for interaction=.46). No single SNP displayed a strong interaction with physical activity.
The researchers noted using less subjective measures of physical activity, replicating the finding in another large prospective cohort, gaining a better understanding of the sex difference observed and generalizing the finding to other ages, ethnicities and races would be important for future studies.
“This study does put forward the possibility that prevention and treatment measures could be optimized based on a patient’s genetic information,” Klimentidis said. “Although major progress has recently been made in understanding the genetic basis of type 2 diabetes, our knowledge is still quite limited, and therefore not yet useful in a clinical setting, at least for vast majority of patients.” — by Allegra Tiver
For More Information: Klimentidis can be reached at Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85724; email: yann@email.arizona.edu.
Disclosure: The ARIC study is a collaborative study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. One researcher was supported by an NIH grant.