Issue: June 2013
May 29, 2013
2 min read
Save

VTE prevention may be unnecessary in bariatric surgery patients

Issue: June 2013
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The literature suggests that measures should be carried out to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, data from a recent analysis of several studies demonstrate there is no conclusive evidence to support their use.

Perspective from Bruce M. Wolfe, MD

Daniel J. Brotman, MD, associate professor of medicine and director of the hospitalist program at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and colleagues wrote that strategies to prevent VTE in patients undergoing bariatric surgery can include augmented dosing of pharmacotherapy (ie, enoxaparin sodium administered >40 mg daily or 30 mg twice daily) and the placement of inferior vena cava filters before surgery.

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Brotman and colleagues assessed the efficacy and safety of these methods. They included 13 articles: five involved patients with and without filters and eight included patients receiving different pharmacologic therapies.

Brotman and colleagues report that none of the selected studies randomly assigned patients to receive various interventions. However, one study reported low–molecular-weight heparin was superior to unfractionated heparin in the prevention of VTE (0.25% vs. 0.68%, P<.001), according to researchers. This particular study also noted no significant differences in bleeding, they added.

Another study suggested that continued postoperative enoxaparin sodium therapy might be more effective in preventing VTE compared with inpatient treatment, they wrote.

Additional data indicate a lack of evidence to support the hypothesis that vena cava filters reduced the risk for pulmonary embolism. Further, they suggested increased rates with filters (RR=1.21; 95% CI, 0.57-2.56), researchers wrote.

Moreover, Brotman and colleagues wrote that low-grade evidence suggested filters were linked to a greater risk for mortality (RR=4.30; 95% CI, 1.60-11.54), in addition to an increased risk for deep vein thrombosis (RR=2.94; 95% CI, 1.35-6.38).

“We found no evidence to support filter placement as prophylaxis in patients undergoing bariatric surgery, with a trend toward higher [deep vein thrombosis] rates and higher mortality in patients receiving filters,” the researchers wrote. “… We note that, despite the patient population, which might be assumed to be at particularly high risk of postoperative VTE because of their body habitus, rates of thrombosis and mortality were reassuringly low.”

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.