Issue: March 2013
February 25, 2013
3 min read
Save

USPSTF: Insufficient evidence on vitamin D, calcium supplementation

Issue: March 2013
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The current evidence on the beneficial balance of vitamin D and calcium supplementation for fracture prevention in adults is lacking, according to a new US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

On behalf of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH, of Baylor College of Medicine, wrote that 56% of women aged at least 60 years currently take vitamin D, and 60% take a calcium supplement.

However, the USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of the benefits or harms of daily supplementation with vitamin D3 >400 IU and calcium >1,000 mg for the primary prevention of fractures in noninstitutionalized, community-dwelling postmenopausal women.

Moreover, the USPSTF recommends against daily supplementation with ≤400 IU of vitamin D3 and ≤1,000 mg of calcium for the primary prevention of fractures in noninstitutionalized, community-dwelling postmenopausal women.

“Research is needed to determine whether daily supplementation with greater than 400 IU vitamin D3 and greater than 1,000 mg calcium reduces fracture incidence in postmenopausal women or older men,” Moyer wrote.

These recommendations exclude treatment of patients with osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiencies.

In an accompanying editorial, Marion Nestle, MPH, PhD, of New York University, and Malden C. Nesheim, PhD, of Cornell University, wrote that vitamin D is not a typical vitamin because it is produced in response to the action of sunlight on skin.

“Like other hormones, vitamin D has multiple roles in the body, not all of them well-understood. Vitamin D supplementation, therefore, must be considered a form of hormone replacement therapy. As such, it raises all of the questions about efficacy, dose, and side effects currently asked of such therapies,” Nestle and Nesheim wrote.

In addition, the USPSTF uses the same precautionary approach that the Institute of Medicine once did, and further recommendations on vitamin D supplementation are highly anticipated, they wrote.

“While we wait for the results of further research, the USPSTF’s cautious, evidence-based advice should encourage clinicians to think carefully before advising calcium and vitamin D supplementation for healthy individuals,” Nestle and Nesheim wrote.

For more information:

Moyer VA. Ann Intern Med. 2013;doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00605.

Nesheim MC. Ann Intern Med. 2013; In press.

Disclosure: Nesheim reports receiving royalties associated with her book from the University of California. Nestle reports receiving payment for lectures, including service on speakers’ bureaus from the Steven Barclay Agency; royalties from published works by the University of California; and travel expenses paid for by various entities.