Issue: April 2012
February 22, 2012
3 min read
Save

FDA panel recommends approval for obesity drug

Issue: April 2012
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The FDA’s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 20-2 to recommend approval of combination phentermine plus topiramate for the treatment of obesity, but also suggested that the FDA require a post-approval cardiovascular outcomes trial.

“Obesity exists in epidemic proportions in the United States, with serious morbidity and mortality consequences, and there is an urgent need for better pharmacological interventions,” committee member Elaine H. Morrato, DrPH, MPH, CPH, told the panel. “Qnexa demonstrated a meaningful efficacy benefit and that there are consequences to nontreatment of obesity. I believe that the FDA and the sponsor are starting to find the right balance between providing access to effective anti-obesity medications and associated risks.”

Elaine H. Morrato, DrPH, MPH, CPH
Elaine H. Morrato

The same committee voted in July 2010 against recommending approval for phentermine plus topiramate (Qnexa, Vivus) because of safety concerns, including the drug’s teratogenicity and an elevation in heart rate and CV events associated with the drug.

“The sponsor has done a good job at demonstrating efficacy, and they need to step up to the plate and do the cardiovascular outcomes trial and do it fast,” committee member Sanjay Kaul, MD, said during the meeting. “There is opportunity for the sponsor to fully characterize the impact of the drug on heart rate and blood pressure.”

Two studies were conducted to determine efficacy of the combination drug, intended for use as an adjunct to lifestyle modifications for treatment of obesity. The first study, OB-302, was a 1-year, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study that included 1,267 obese adults. Participants on the drug lost 14.4% of their baseline body weight.

The second study, OB-303, was a 1-year, randomized, double blind study that included 2,487 overweight and obese adults. Participants who took the drug lost 12.4% of their baseline body weight.

To further evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the drug, a 1-year extension study to OB-303 was conducted. The study, OB-305, was also a double blind, placebo-controlled trial that included 676 of the participants on the OB-303 trial. In the study, there were small increases in heart rate among participants who took the drug, but the increase was only significant among those who took the top dose of the drug vs. the low dose or the middle dose. There was no connection between this increase in heart rate and major adverse coronary events in those participants who took the drug.

Regarding teratogenicity, the prevalence of major congenital malformations associated with topiramate exposure during pregnancy was analyzed in three studies. The studies found that although topiramate exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy had no effect on prevalence of major congenital malformations overall, there may be a twofold increase in the prevalence of oral clefts.

Vivus proposed a Risk Evaluation and Medication Strategy (REMS) consisting of a medication guide, a communication plan and Elements to Assure Safe Use (EASU) for health care provider training and pharmacy training.

Although the FDA is not required to follow the recommendations of the advisory committees, it usually does.

PERSPECTIVE

George A. Bray, MD
George A. Bray

There has been a chance to again examine the data on phentermine/topiramate in terms of weight loss and the drug's potential benefits. Actually, what the FDA had said before is that they wanted an outcomes trial prior to approval of the medication. What the advisory committee recommended at this meeting, to the best of my knowledge, was to have the outcomes trial done after approval and limiting the approval. After the 20-2 vote for approval, the FDA has to evaluate all the information in light of everything else that they know and come to the best decision they can.

Having additional drugs for weight loss would be useful. Obviously, it's been a frustrating path for companies trying to jump over the hurdles or through the hoops that have been set up for review, and I know that the agency is concerned about procedures and process and what is the best way to approve new drugs. Currently, there is only one agent approved for long-term treatment of obesity. In contrast, for other diseases such as hypertension, hypercholesterol or diabetes, there are many agents in several different classes. So, there's clearly a need for additional drugs to help health professionals support their patients.

George A. Bray, MD
Endocrine Today Editorial Board member

Twitter Follow EndocrineToday.com on Twitter.