Read more

May 20, 2024
2 min read
Save

To test or not to test: Isotretinoin marginally increases risk for severe adverse events

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Those taking isotretinoin exhibited a 7.85 times increased risk for severe hypertriglyceridemia vs. those taking oral antibiotics.
  • They were also 1.45 times more likely to have severely elevated liver enzymes.
Perspective from John Barbieri, MD, MBA

Isotretinoin is associated with a clinically marginal increased risk for severe adverse events, leading researchers to advise routine blood testing commence shortly after initiation, according to a study.

Isotretinoin is a mainstay treatment for severe acne as it exhibits “remarkable clinical efficacy and sustained results,” according to Shirin Emtenani, MSc, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher for the Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology at the University of Lübeck in Germany, and colleagues. However, the drug is also associated with various severe adverse events including hypertriglyceridemia, liver enzyme abnormalities, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia.

Acne 2
Isotretinoin is associated with a clinically marginal increased risk for severe adverse events, leading researchers to advise routine blood testing commence shortly after initiation. Image: Adobe Stock.

Current guidelines require patients to be subjected to frequent laboratory monitoring, but many clinicians have challenged the necessity of how often these tests are to be performed.

“A substantial knowledge gap exists regarding the most effective laboratory monitoring routine for acne patients receiving isotretinoin treatment,” Emtenani and colleagues wrote. “Several reports have raised doubts about the clinical value of frequent (eg, baseline testing and/or monthly follow-up) laboratory monitoring and have proposed a reduction in monitoring frequencies.”

In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the risk for mild and severe abnormal laboratory parameters among patients with acne that are treated with isotretinoin vs. oral antibiotics in an effort to answer whether frequent monitoring is necessary.

The study included two groups, both with 79,012 patients matched for demographic variables and major comorbidities. One group was treated for acne with isotretinoin, whereas the other was treated with oral antibiotics. Researchers evaluated patients’ laboratory results and categorized them as grade 1 or higher, meaning mild risk to health, and grade 3 or higher, meaning severe risk to health.

Results showed that those taking isotretinoin exhibited a 7.85 times (95% CI, 5.58-11.05) increased risk for grade 3 or higher hypertriglyceridemia compared with those taking oral antibiotics within the first 3 months of treatment.

Regarding liver function, isotretinoin-treated patients were also 1.45 times (95% CI, 1.13-1.85) more likely to have grade 3 or higher elevated aspartate transaminase levels vs. antibiotic-treated patients in the same time period.

While isotretinoin-treated patients encountered a higher risk than their antibiotic-treated counterparts, the absolute risk for severe hypertriglyceridemia and elevated aspartate transaminase levels among isotretinoin users was 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. The clinical difference of these findings was marginal, with three and one respective cases occurring every 1,000 patients starting isotretinoin.

There was no significant risk for severe impairment in cholesterol, alanine transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transferase or creatinine levels during isotretinoin treatment. According to the authors, these collective results should “reassure physicians regarding the safety of isotretinoin in daily practice.”

“As our time-stratified analysis disclosed that the highest risk of laboratory disturbances occurred 1 to 3 months after drug initiation, we believe that routine laboratory monitoring should be performed in this timeframe, maybe 2 months after commencing treatment,” Emtenani and colleagues concluded.