Fact checked byKristen Dowd

Read more

March 12, 2024
3 min read
Save

New data show ritlecitinib plus phototherapy beneficial for nonsegmental vitiligo

Fact checked byKristen Dowd
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Ritlecitinib alone or paired with twice weekly phototherapy was safe and effective for adults with nonsegmental vitiligo.
  • Add-on phototherapy may improve ritlecitinib efficacy, but more study is needed.

SAN DIEGO — In patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo, ritlecitinib monotherapy or paired with twice weekly narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy improved facial and total body repigmentation, according to a speaker here.

Current treatments for vitiligo remain limited and include narrowband UVB, topical and systemic immune suppressants, topical ruxolitinib and surgery, Emma Guttman-Yassky, MD, PhD, the Waldman Professor and System Chair of the Kimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, said during a late-breaking research presentation at the American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting. Data show narrowband UVB induces melanocyte differentiation and repigmentation, whereas ritlecitinib (Litfulo, Pfizer), a selective dual Janus kinase 3 and tyrosine family kinase inhibitor under investigation for treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo, has been shown to be safe and effective in a phase 2b trial.

Vitiligo hands
In patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo, ritlecitinib monotherapy or paired with twice weekly narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy improved facial and total body repigmentation. Image: Adobe Stock.

“For many years, we knew that phototherapy helps in vitiligo,” Guttman-Yassky told Healio. “With new medications for vitiligo we did not know if there is an added benefit to use both a medication, like an oral medication, and to add phototherapy. This is the first study that shows that there is actually an added benefit for phototherapy. If we use both, [results are] even better. Not everyone has access to phototherapy, and there are, of course, practical constraints. But, if it is possible, the combination would be something feasible.”

Emma Guttman-Yassky

Guttman-Yassky and colleagues analyzed data from 230 adults with nonsegmental vitiligo who completed an extension study after a 24-week dose-ranging period of the phase 2b study. Researchers randomly assigned patients to receive ritlecitinib 50 mg once daily with a 4-week, 200 mg once daily loading dose (n = 187; mean age, 44.7 years; 57.2% women; 67.4% white), or to ritlecitinib plus narrowband UVB phototherapy twice weekly (n = 43; mean age, 46.3 years; 55.8% women; 60.5% white). Outcomes included percent change from baseline to week 24 in facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI), total VASI (T-VASI), patients’ global impressions of change in vitiligo and safety.

“Patients who were randomized in this trial were those who did not achieve total VASI of 50% or more or those who had less than 50% improvement during the 16 weeks of the dose-ranging period,” Guttman-Yassky said during the presentation.

Due to a protocol-required lack-of-efficacy dropout at extension week 12 for the narrowband UVB group, researchers conducted supportive analyses using last observation carried forward (LOCF) to adjust for a dropout effect on the efficacy of add-on UVB against monotherapy, Guttman-Yassky said.

Researchers found that mean percent change from baseline to 24 weeks in F-VASI was –55.1% vs. –69.6% for participants in the ritlecitinib monotherapy and combination phototherapy groups, respectively (P = .009). At week 24, 29.2% of patients in the ritlecitinib monotherapy group and 60.9% of patients in the combination therapy group met a score of F-VASI 75 (P = .007).

“It strikes us here that this was a very nice response, regardless of narrowband UVB,” Guttman-Yassky said.

Mean percent change from baseline to 24 weeks in T-VASI was –24.5% vs. –46.8% for participants in the ritlecitinib monotherapy and combination phototherapy groups, respectively (P < .001).

The percentage of participants reporting “much improved” or “very much improved” on the patients’ global impressions of change in vitiligo was 30% and 57.7% for those in the ritlecitinib monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively (P = .012). There was also a trend for significance in the LOCF analyses. There were no new safety events observed.

“This answers a million-dollar question that all of us in dermatology felt might be the case, but we never actually had the proof,” Guttman-Yassky said during the presentation.

Guttman-Yassky noted that add-on narrowband UVB therapy appeared to improve ritlecitinib efficacy; however, more study is needed with larger cohorts. Yet, Guttman-Yassky said she would recommend combination therapy for patients who would be good candidates.

“If it is possible for the patient to receive oral [medication] and phototherapy, this would be my preference,” Guttman-Yassky told Healio.