Read more

March 25, 2022
2 min read
Save

Rate of unconfirmed penicillin allergy labels among children raises concerns

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

An examination of the health records of more than 330,000 children in two large pediatric primary care networks has raised concerns about the validity of penicillin allergy labels, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.

The results showed that many penicillin allergy labels (PALs) in children were placed before 2 years and age and after little or no exposure to penicillin.

37.7% of children with a penicillin allergy label got their label after one penicillin prescription, while 7.9% got the label without ever receiving a prescription.
Data were derived from Taylor MG, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2117.

Margaret G. Taylor, MD, a clinical postdoctoral fellow at Baylor College of Medicine, and colleagues noted that unconfirmed PALs could lead to unnecessary use of broad-spectrum, second-line antibiotics.

Children with unconfirmed PALs also have longer hospital stays, higher rates of adverse events and more infections caused by Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus than children who do not have PALs, the researchers wrote.

The retrospective, longitudinal birth cohort study involved 334,465 children (mean age at censor date, 3.8 years; interquartile range [IQR], 1.7-6.6; 49.1% girls; 44.4% non-Hispanic white) attending 90 primary care pediatric practices related to Texas Children’s Pediatrics (TCP) and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).

During the study period, 946,592 penicillin derivatives were prescribed, most of which (80.2%) were prescribed in the primary care setting.

Overall, 5.4% of these children had a PAL, placed at a median age of 1.3 years (IQR, 0.9-2.3), with 90.8% placed within 24 hours of a primary care encounter or health care communication. Only 12.5% of these PALs were eventually removed during the study period.

Children identified as non-Hispanic white had significantly greater odds of receiving a PAL than non-Hispanic Black children (adjusted OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.8).

Children who received at least one penicillin prescription via primary care before age 2 years were more likely to receive a PAL than those who did not (aOR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.8).

Whereas 37.7% of the children received a PAL after their first penicillin prescription from TCP or CHOP health care settings, 7.9% were labeled without receiving any penicillin prescription. Overall, the researchers said, almost half of the children in the study received a PAL after one or zero penicillin prescriptions.

Based on previous studies showing that less than 5% of children with a PAL are found to have a type 1 hypersensitivity allergy after skin testing or oral challenges, the researchers wrote that more than 16,000 children in their cohort would likely have inaccurate PALs.

The researchers called for quality improvement efforts directed toward primary care providers, who are most likely to engage with children outside of acute illness, to address unconfirmed PALs and identify ways to redocument these children.

Because most hypersensitivity responses follow at least two distinct exposures to penicillin derivatives, the researchers wrote, the 37.7% of children who were labeled after their first penicillin prescription probably had a prior anticipated adverse drug reaction or an unspecified viral illness. Graded oral challenges may be needed to remove their PALs.

The PALs given to children who did not receive any penicillin may be due to in utero exposure to penicillin derivatives, exposure to cephalosporin antibiotics or a family history of penicillin allergy, the researchers wrote, adding that future research should explore the reasons behind these PALs.