Read more

February 09, 2022
5 min read
Save

Pregnant women can safely tolerate testing for reported penicillin allergy

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy can safely undergo penicillin skin testing and incremental drug challenges without adverse effects in their pregnancy, according to a study published in Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Perspective from Allison C. Ramsey, MD

The need for delabeling

Beta-lactam antibiotics are first-line treatment for preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM), chorioamnionitis and prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries among other conditions in pregnancy, according to the researchers. Although approximately 10% of the population report a penicillin allergy, the researchers continued, more than 90% of patients with reported penicillin allergy can safely tolerate it after a complete evaluation.

“There are two reasons for this,” Jumy (Olajumoke) Fadugba, MD, FAAAAI, study author, chief of section of allergy and immunology at Penn Medicine, and associate professor of clinical medicine and fellowship program director of allergy and immunology at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, told Healio.

Jumy (Olajumoke) Fadugba

“One is that some people's original rash/hives may have been due to the illness itself, especially viral illness in children,” she said. “The other reason is that even people who had a true allergic to a penicillin antibiotic in their youth often ‘outgrow’ it. The further out you are from the original reaction, the less likely you are to still be allergic to it.”

People with a penicillin allergy label have significantly worse clinical outcomes than those who don't have one, Fadugba continued. Additionally, patients who use more broad-spectrum antibiotics have more microbial antibiotic resistance, which is a rising public health problem, and gut infection such as Clostridium difficile, she said.

Allergists should then try and test patients for penicillin allergy, Fadugba said. If the test is negative, allergists should then remove the label so these patients can receive appropriate antibiotics for their condition.

“Pregnant women are a particularly important population to try and delabel because during the course of pregnancy, delivery and right after delivery, there are many reasons why a pregnant woman may need a penicillin or related beta-lactam antibiotic,” Fadugba said.

Approximately one-third of pregnant women eventually need penicillin or a related antibiotic, Fadugba said, adding that penicillin allergy during pregnancy is associated with increased rates of cesarean delivery, post-cesarean wound complications and increased hospital stays.

Even though the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that women with penicillin allergy be evaluated before delivery, penicillin allergy testing during pregnancy was infrequent when this study was initiated, with persistent hesitancy to test or refer pregnant women, Fadugba said.

“There are reports that some doctors are concerned about the safety of testing pregnant women and may worry about an adverse effect on the woman or baby,” she said.

The study’s results

Noting previous studies showing that pregnant women could undergo penicillin testing successfully, the researchers set out to demonstrate that the skin test for penicillin and the oral challenge for amoxicillin do not result in worse outcomes for mother and child.

The single-center, retrospective electronic chart review involved 136 pregnant women (mean age, 32.5 years; standard deviation, 4.2; 78% white) referred to an outpatient allergy and immunology clinic for penicillin allergy evaluation, where they were risk-assessed via a screening questionnaire through the electronic medical record about their allergy history.

According to the study, 112 women said a penicillin antibiotic was the index drug, and four women reported that cephalosporin caused their drug reaction. These reactions occurred more than 5 years before in 91% of the cases and more than 10 years before in 85% of the cases.

These reported reactions included unspecified rash (44%), hives (39%), angioedema or facial swelling (4%), shortness of breath (4%), throat symptoms (1%), prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms (< 1%) and dizziness (< 1%).

Providers at the clinic then performed skin prick and intradermal testing per standard protocol on 133 of the women. Penicillin skin testing (PST) was negative for 129 (97%) of them. Three (2%) of the participants had suboptimal intradermal histamine. Avoidance was recommended for the one patient with a positive PST.

Next, 133 of the participants took a two-step or three-step oral incremental drug challenge (IDC) to amoxicillin or oral penicillin V during the same visit. All participants passed the IDC, and their penicillin label was removed.

The researchers then followed 135 of these women during their pregnancy, with 68 (50%) of them using at least one beta-lactam during delivery. Specifically, 47 (35%) used penicillin and 34 (25%) used cephalosporin. Of the 68 women, 67 (97%) tolerated treatment without reactions.

The patient with a reaction experienced immediate nausea and itching after receiving penicillin V with no documented changes in vital signs or observed rash or angioedema. After successful treatment with diphenhydramine and ondansetron, a penicillin label was added back to her chart.

During the postpartum period, 21 (15%) of the participants who were evaluated for penicillin allergy received antibiotics, and 14 of them (10%) used beta-lactams. There were no adverse drug reactions reported.

Compared with a control group of 1,349 women with a penicillin allergy label who were not evaluated for penicillin allergy, the participants (mean age, 32.5 years; standard deviation, 4.2; 78% white) who were evaluated saw no difference in gestational age at delivery (38.8 weeks in the evaluation group vs. 38.5 weeks in the control group).

Also, there were no differences in neonatal birth weight (3,185 g vs. 3,174 g) or risks for cesarean section (OR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.88-1.96). The researchers further found no association between evaluation and preterm labor, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, placental abruption or PROM, nor were there any differences in the risk for having a pregnancy complication between the groups (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 0.84-2.36).

The researchers concluded that pregnant women could be evaluated for penicillin allergy safely via PST and oral IDC and potentially see their penicillin allergy label removed, enabling them to benefit from the use of these antibiotics without increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

“We found that penicillin testing in pregnant women was not associated with worse outcomes for the woman and baby,” Fadugba said. “The findings were not surprising, but rather confirmed what we expect.”

Next steps for care, research

When pregnant patients have a penicillin or amoxicillin allergy on their record, providers should discuss the importance of having this label addressed and should refer patients to a specialist — usually an allergist — who can perform testing with the required expertise in a safe environment where the patient can be monitored for a reaction, Fadugba said.

“Allergy specialists will hopefully use this data to support the idea that penicillin testing in low-risk pregnant patients does not result in worse outcomes for mother and child and may therefore perform testing more readily in appropriate patients,” she said.

However, Fadugba also noted that providers first need to take a good history of their patients to ensure they are at very low risk for having a severe hypersensitivity reaction before undergoing testing. She also said that there were disproportionately fewer nonwhite (African American and Hispanic) pregnant women who underwent evaluation during the study.

“An important future endeavor would be to identify potential barriers that patients may face to being evaluated for their allergy and to address these barriers in order to benefit a broader patient population,” she said.

For more information:

Jumy (Olajumoke) Fadugba, MD, FAAAAI, can be reached at olajumoke.fadugba@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.