We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.
Poor quality of life was the primary reason why 9.3% of families pursued peanut oral immunotherapy, according to a study published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice.
Even when patients with peanut allergy practice strict avoidance, incidence of accidental exposure to peanut is approximately 10% annually, and 30% of exposures require epinephrine and medical attention, according to Sara Patrawala, MD, allergy and immunology fellow at University of Rochester School of Medicine, and colleagues.
Because the use of FDA-approved peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) may increase the threshold dose of peanut required to elicit a clinical reaction and improve quality of life (QoL), Patrawala and colleagues sought to determine the real-world adoption rates of POIT, and to understand the rationale for pursuing or declining POIT.
The prospective, observational study involved 237 participants (median age, 8 years; age range, 4-17 years; 65.4% boys) with peanut allergy treated at a hospital-based allergy/immunology practice between May 2020 and April 2021, Of the 237 participants, 150 (63.2%) reported additional food allergies.
The children, adolescents and parents involved in the study completed questionnaires about food allergy QoL before their allergists discussed POIT them. Higher scores indicated lower QoL.
Overall, 76.6% of the children completed the FAQL-CF with a median score of 95 (interquartile range [IQR], 34.5-138.7), and 80% of the adolescents completed the FAQL-TF with a median score of 71.5 (IQR, 32.7-107.5). All participants had a parent complete a questionnaire, with a median score of 33.3 (IQR, 19-59).
Twenty-two (9.3%) of the 237 participants chose FDA-approved POIT, most commonly for “protection against accidental ingestion.”
Children aged 8 to 12 years (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1-1.02; P < .001) and their caregivers (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P = .01) with low QoL were more likely to pursue POIT.
Also, children aged 8 to 12 years overall reported lower QoL than adolescents, and these families were more likely to pursue POIT. Poorer parental QoL was an independent factor for predicting pursuit of POIT, indicating the significant role of parental anxiety and QoL in POIT uptake, the researchers wrote.
Meanwhile, 215 (90.7%) declined therapy, primarily due to “concern over adverse effects” (35.4%) and “concern over the degree of commitment” (28.5%). The researchers indicated they were not surprised by these findings because patients receiving POIT experience more gastrointestinal side effects than those practicing strict avoidance.
A prior history of accidental peanut exposure, history of epinephrine use and comorbid food allergies did not influence the decision to pursue or decline POIT, the researchers found.
The influence of QoL on the decision to pursue POIT underscores the importance of shared decision-making between the allergist and families with peanut allergy, the researchers wrote.
Calling their study the first to evaluate real-world uptake of FDA-approved POIT, the researchers also said that future studies should further explore the adoption of POIT over time and in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.