Read more

May 31, 2022
2 min read
Save

Trends in postpartum contraceptive methods shift in US

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Between 2016 and 2018, the rate of immediately postpartum long-term contraceptive placement increased while the rate of tubal ligations decreased, according to a retrospective, nationally representative cohort study.

Perspective from Sarah Horvath, MD, MSHP

However, “the rates of inpatient permanent contraception still outnumber rates of [long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)] insertion,” Nancy Z. Fang, MD, MS, an assistant professor in the department of OB/GYN and family planning at the University of Colorado Medicine, told Healio.

Although the rate of immediate postpartum LARC placement increased as the rate of tubal ligation decreased in the United States, the choice of tubal ligations continued to outpace that of LARCs. Source: Adobe Stock
Although the rate of immediate postpartum LARC placement increased as the rate of tubal ligation decreased in the United States, the choice of tubal ligations continued to outpace that of LARCs. Source: Adobe Stock

Fang and colleagues used data from the National Inpatient Sample to evaluate the rates of LARC placement — which included receiving an IUD or contraceptive implant — and tubal ligation among patients with a delivery-related discharge between 2016 and 2018.

LARC insertion

Among 11,083,180 delivery hospitalizations, 55,775 women received a LARC device during the study period. The rate increased from 2.4 insertions per 1,000 deliveries in 2016 to 7.5 per 1,000 deliveries in 2018. Specifically, IUD insertions increased from 2.2 to 5 per 1,000 deliveries between 2016 and 2018, while implant insertions increased from 0.3 to 2.5 per 1,000 deliveries.

Women were more likely to receive LARC vs. tubal ligation if they were aged younger than 25 years (adjusted OR = 7.38; 95% CI, 6.9-7.9).

Tubal ligation

Overall, 698,299 women underwent tubal ligation between 2016 and 2018, with the rate of tubal ligation decreasing from 64.2 to 62.1 per 1,000 deliveries during that time. Tubal ligation was more likely in women who had a cesarean delivery compared with those who delivered vaginally (aOR = 8.83; 95% CI, 8.73-8.97).

Although rates of inpatient tubal ligation remained higher than those of LARC placement during the study period, inpatient tubal ligation was “half as common” in 2018 as it was in 2006, according to Fang.

Of note, women with public insurance were more likely to either receive LARC (aOR = 4.83; 95% CI, 4.59-5.06) or undergo tubal ligation (aOR = 2.1; 95% CI, 2-2.1) compared with women who had private insurance. Among women with public insurance, LARC placement was more likely than tubal ligation (aOR = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.88-2.09).

Nancy Z. Fang, MD, MS
Nancy Z. Fang

Moving forward, Fang emphasized the importance of addressing the “reproductive justice issue” of access to permanent and reversible contraception.

“I would like to see national trends for outpatient permanent contraception and continued work in identifying barriers in access to permanent contraception and LARC,” she said. “There is also a critical need to identify and prevent coercion related to these methods.”