Read more

August 26, 2021
1 min read
Save

Study offers ‘some reassurance’ about prenatal antipsychotic use

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Researchers reported that prenatal use of antipsychotics was not associated with risks for adverse outcomes in children — specifically, ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, preterm birth or being born small for gestational age.

Perspective from Mary C. Kimmel, MD

However, underlying maternal psychiatric disorders may be associated with ADHD and ASD in children, they said. 

Kenneth K.C. Man, PhD, a fellow in the research department of practice and policy at the University College London School of Pharmacy, told Healio that there “is an increasing trend of antipsychotics prescribing for pregnant women,” but there are limited studies about the safety of the medications and long-term outcomes in children.

“Therefore, gaining knowledge on the safety of medication use during pregnancy is a public health priority,” he said.

The researchers examined the link between maternal antipsychotic use and an increased risk for ASD, preterm birth and small for gestational age in a cohort of 411,251 mother-child pairs, and they examined the link between antipsychotic use and ADHD in a cohort of 333,749 pairs. The data were collected through the Hong Kong Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System. Women who were exposed to antidepressants and/or lithium while pregnant were not included in the analysis. The infants were born between January 2001 and January 2015, and they were followed up through December 2019.

Man and colleagues reported that among all children, 3.95% were eventually diagnosed with ADHD, 2.12% with ASD, 8.24% were preterm and 1.7% were small for gestational age. Comparing gestationally exposed with nonexposed individuals, the researchers found that the weighted hazard ratio (wHR) was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.83-1.61) for ADHD and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.7-1.6) for ASD, whereas the weighted odds ratio (wOR) was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.13-1.75) for preterm birth and 1.36 (95% CI, 0.86-2.14) for small for gestational age.

Although maternal antipsychotic use during pregnancy was associated with a small increased risk for preterm birth, additional analyses showed no such association when the researchers compared women with gestational exposure and those with past exposure (ADHD: wHR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.6-1.61; ASD: wHR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.58-2.08; preterm birth: wOR =  0.93; 95% CI, 0.7-1.24; and small for gestational age: wOR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.66-2.2). A sibling-matched analysis also failed to show a link (ADHD: wHR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.04-4.93; ASD: wHR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-2.01; preterm birth: wOR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.85-1.82; and small for gestational age: wOR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.32-2.31).

“However, among pregnant women who were never exposed to antipsychotics, children born to mothers with psychiatric disorders had a higher risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (ASD and ADHD), but not negative birth outcomes (preterm birth and small for gestational age) compared with those with mothers without psychiatric disorders,” the researchers wrote.

According to Man and colleagues, the study did not include data from mother-child pairs who presented to private hospitals and medical practitioners, although they noted that in Hong Kong, children with neurodevelopmental disorders usually receive care from the public sector. Additionally, they could not confirm if the women had adhered to their antipsychotic medications, “which may affect the accuracy of the results,” they wrote. Information like the mothers’ BMI, alcohol consumption and smoking history also were not available, and because the data were collected in Hong Kong, “it is unclear whether the results are generalizable,” they said.

Notwithstanding the study’s limitations, Man said the results show a clear message: “Patients should not be fearful of antipsychotic medications causing harm to the future child. Instead, proper management of their existing condition should be prioritized.”

Amanda Yeaton-Massey, MD, medical director of outpatient obstetrics at the University of California, San Francisco, and colleagues wrote in an invited commentary that the study findings should “provide some reassurance” to both patients and clinicians.

“This study also highlights that pregnant patients with psychiatric diagnoses, whether or not they are prescribed medication, are at high risk of adverse maternal and child outcomes and need higher levels of medical and psychosocial support that extend well beyond delivery,” they wrote.

Wang Z, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4571.

References:

Wang Z, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4571.

Yeaton-Massey A, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4562.