Fact checked byShenaz Bagha

Read more

March 27, 2025
5 min read
Save

Misinformation on TikTok can lead to misunderstanding of ADHD, inaccurate self-diagnosis

Fact checked byShenaz Bagha

Key takeaways:

  • Psychologists said fewer than half of the ADHD-symptom claims in the analyzed TikTok videos were accurate.
  • The level of ADHD-related content viewed was linked to perceptions of ADHD prevalence and struggles.
Perspective from David W. Goodman, MD, LFAPA

ADHD-related TikTok content shapes viewer perceptions of the condition, but experts found that the videos often make inaccurate claims regarding symptoms and treatment, according to a study published in PLOS ONE.

More specifically, ADHD-related TikTok content may lead to inaccurate self-diagnosis and overestimation of ADHD prevalence, according to the study.

Psych0325Karasavva_Graphic_01
Data were derived from Karasavva V, et al. PLoS One. 2025;doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319335.

#ADHD is one of the 10 most-viewed health-related hashtags on TikTok, according to the researchers, who noted that previous research shows that mental health experts and young adults disagree concerning the psychoeducational quality of ADHD content on TikTok.

“TikTok can be an incredible tool for raising awareness and reducing stigma, but it also has a downside,” Vasileia Karasavva, a PhD student in clinical psychology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, said in a related press release. “Anecdotes and personal experiences are powerful, but when they lack context, they can lead to misunderstandings about ADHD and mental health in general.”

Accuracy of claims

Karasavva and colleagues performed two analyses to evaluate ADHD-related TikTok content. The first focused on the popularity of this content and how creators’ claims about ADHD align with the opinions of experts.

Two of the study authors independently assessed the psychoeducational accuracy, nuance and quality of the claims made in 98 of the top 100 #ADHD TikTok videos.

They found that the 90 top videos with a recorded view count amassed over 495 million views, with an average of 5.47 million views (standard deviation [SD], 6,410,138) per video.

In most of the videos (93.9%), the creators did not refer to any source regarding their claims about ADHD.

Ninety-two of the 98 total videos made claims about ADHD symptoms. The two psychologists rated fewer than half (48.7%) of the symptom claims in the videos as accurate and considered 4.1% of the symptom videos as nuanced, meaning the creator acknowledged that the claims made in the video may not apply to all people with ADHD.

Of the 18 claims about ADHD treatment made in six videos, the researchers judged 55.6% as accurate and none as nuanced.

The researchers also gave each video a global score based on whether they would recommend it to others as a source of ADHD psychoeducation, with one signifying absolutely would not recommend and five signifying would definitely recommend. The average global score for the ADHD videos was 1.78 (SD, 0.82).

Content consumption

In the second analysis, 843 undergraduate students (79.4% women; 54.3% Asian) in Western Canada completed questionnaires about their frequency of viewing ADHD-related TikTok content and their perceptions of ADHD between January 2024 and March 2024. Of the students, 224 reported that they did not have ADHD, 421 reported self-diagnosed ADHD and 198 had a formal ADHD diagnosis.

First, the researchers found that participants with a self-diagnosis of ADHD viewed significantly more ADHD-related content than participants without ADHD (P < .001) but significantly less content than participants with a formal ADHD diagnosis (P = .002).

After controlling for demographics, the researchers found that participants were more likely to perceive the content as helpful and accurate if they reported greater content engagement (P < .001) or were self-diagnosed (P = .04) compared with those without ADHD.

Further, the researchers asked the students to rank the top five and bottom five psychologist-rated videos from the first analysis. The participants found the top five videos less worthy of recommendation than the psychologists (global score, 2.82 vs. 3.6) but they deemed the bottom five videos more worthy of recommendation than the psychologists (global score: 2.3 vs. 1.1; P < .001 for both).

After controlling for demographics, Karasavva and colleagues found that self-diagnosed participants estimated a greater prevalence of ADHD in the general population compared with the other groups (both P < .001). As ADHD-related content consumption increased, so did estimated ADHD prevalence rates and the perception than the average person with ADHD struggles more with their symptoms.

The researchers noted that both analyses may have limited generalizability to less popular ADHD content or beyond graduate students.

Ultimately, addressing the disparity between TikTok content and psychologists’ perceptions may help to better serve this population, according to the researchers.

Reference: