Issue: October 2019

Read more

August 06, 2019
3 min read
Save

Solid food guidelines contribute to infants’ unhealthy weight

Issue: October 2019
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Perspective from Keli Hawthorne, MS, RD, LD
Photo of Bruce Lee 
Bruce Y. Lee
Photo of Marie Ferguson 
Marie C. Ferguson

Guidelines currently endorsed by several hospitals and infant formula manufacturers that recommend introducing solids to infants may contribute to both overweight and underweight by age 1 year, according to research published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

On the national level, the CDC, the AAP and the United States Department of Agriculture’s Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children have all issued recommendations for introducing solids, otherwise known as complementary foods, into infants’ diets. Additionally, hospitals and infant formula manufacturers have provided recommendations on introducing complementary foods. However, according to Bruce Y. Lee, MD, associate professor of international health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and colleagues, these “guidelines vary appreciably in how much and what types of foods to provide.

“Every infant is different, with different body types, sizes and circumstance, so it is difficult to have one-size-fits-all recommendations,” Lee told Infectious Diseases in Children. “The first year is crucial for future development because that's when a person's metabolism, hunger levels and feeding behaviors are often established, making it more difficult to lose weight later in life.” 

The researchers created a computer model that simulated feeding behaviors, activity levels, metabolism and body size of infants aged between 6 months and 1 year. The infants’ daily food intake in the simulation model was based on feeding recommendations endorsed by Johns Hopkins Medicine, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Similac and Enfamil, which changed the infants’ body weight.

Additional simulations were conducted to assess the impact of complementary feeding guidelines endorsed by CHOP, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Enfamil and Similac.

None of the four guidelines used in the simulations resulted in normal weight among the virtual infants who were also breastfed at age 12 months. Infants who received half the amount of breastmilk and were introduced to complementary foods based on guidelines from CHOP, Johns Hopkins and Enfamil had overweight BMIs between the ages of 9 and 11 months. Unhealthy underweight BMIs were also observed among infants between ages 7 and 11 months who had their breastmilk consumption halved and followed the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Johns Hopkins Medicine and Similac guidelines for complementary food intake.

“It is unclear how the suggested daily serving sizes for different food groups were developed and in which situations they should be applied. Pediatricians should understand that current guidelines are only rough guides and can instead emphasize the importance of responsive feeding practices,” Marie C. Ferguson, MSPH, a research associate at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Infectious Diseases in Children. “Responsive feeding includes caregivers spending time and attention learning the reactions and cues of their baby and responding to support their needs.”

Ferguson added that pediatricians can also spend additional time with caregivers and their infants to better understand their feeding routines as well as the child’s appetite and growth to inform parents how and when to introduce complimentary foods. by Katherine Bortz

Disclosures: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.