May 26, 2015
3 min read
Save

Delaying cord clamping improves neurodevelopment at 4 years

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

While no differences were observed in full-scale IQ between infants with delayed umbilical cord clamping vs. those with early umbilical cord clamping, delayed clamping resulted in improvements in fine-motor and social skills at age 4 — particularly among boys.

“Delaying umbilical cord clamping by 2 to 3 minutes after delivery allows fetal blood remaining in the placental circulation to be transfused back to the newborn,” Ola Andersson, MD, PhD, of Uppsala University in Sweden, and colleagues wrote. This process has been associated with improved iron status at 4 to 6 months of age.

“There is a lack of knowledge regarding the long-term effects and evidence of no harm, causing policymakers to be hesitant to make clear recommendations concerning delayed cord clamping in full-term infants,” the investigators wrote.

For the follow-up to a randomized trial conducted at a Swedish hospital during April 16, 2008 to May 21, 2010, Andersson and colleagues assessed the IQ, development and behavior of 263 children at age 4 years with the use of IQ tests, questionnaires and other assessments. Delayed cord clamping (n = 141) was considered to be 3 minutes or longer after delivery; early cord clamping (n = 122) was considered to be 10 seconds or less after delivery.

There were no differences in Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale (WPPS) of Intelligence III scores between groups. Improvements were observed, however, among children with delayed cord clamping in adjusted mean differences (AMD) in the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) personal-social domains (2.8; 95% CI, 0.8-4.7), fine-motor domains (2.1; 95% CI, 0.2-4) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire prosocial subscale (0.5; 95% CI, >0.0-0.9).

Compared with children with early cord clamping, fewer children with delayed cord clamping experienced results less than the cut-off in the ASQ fine-motor domain (11% vs. 3.7%; P = .02) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children bicycle-trail task (MABC; 12.9% vs. 3.8%; P = .02).

Adjusted mean differences were significantly increased among boys who received delayed cord clamping for WPPS of Intelligence III processing-speed quotient (4.2; 95% CI, 0.8-7.6), MABC bicycle-trail task (0.8; 95% CI, 0.1-1.5), fine motor domains of the ASQ, Third Edition (4.7; 95% CI, 1-8.4) as well as personal-social domains of the ASQ (4.9; 95% CI, 1.6-8.3).

In an accompanying editorial, Heike Rabe, MD, PhD, of the Brighton and Sussex Medical School and University Hospitals, Brighton, England, and colleagues wrote: “Awareness of the benefits for all newborns continues to increase as more studies are published. While many physicians have incorporated delayed cord clamping into practice, there remains a hesitation to implement delayed cord clamping, particularly with full-term infants. As evidence of the safety benefits of delayed cord clamping are demonstrated, this hesitation should disappear.

“We applaud Andersson and colleagues for their persistence because their study closes the knowledge gap regarding the long-term safety of delayed cord clamping in healthy full-term newborns. Their important findings suggest that there is an absence of harm that lasts until 4 years of age.” – by Jennifer Southall

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.