October 09, 2014
2 min read
Save

Athletes in contact sports more likely to carry MRSA

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

PHILADELPHIA — Contact sport athletes were more likely to carry methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus compared with non-contact sport athletes, according to data presented at IDWeek 2014.

Perspective from Paul G. Auwaerter

“Our findings indicated that those in contact sports are at higher risk for carrying this bacteria MRSA and potentially to gain infections,” Natalia Jimenez-Truque, PhD, MSCI, of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said during a press conference. “What we should do to prevent it is stress good hygiene in these athletes, which is to tell them to wash hands regularly, shower after every game and practice, wash equipment frequently … not share personal items, and if they have a wound or a cut, cover it appropriately.”

Natalia Jimenez-Truque

Natalia Jimenez-Truque

 

Researchers examined monthly nasal and oropharyngeal swabs obtained from college varsity athletes (n=377) of both contact (n=224) and non-contact (n=153) sports. Primary outcomes were the presence of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), with secondary outcome being time to colonization with S. aureus.

Researchers found that contact sport athletes had higher odds of being colonized with MRSA (OR=2.36; 95% CI, 1.13-4.93) than non-contact athletes, and acquired S. aureus more quickly (HR=1.61; 95% CI, 1.02-2.55). More contact sport athletes also carried S. aureus for longer periods, both as an intermittent carrier (OR=3.60; 95% CI, 2.02-6.40) and as a persistent carrier (OR=2.36; 95% CI, 1.13-4.93).

Jimenez-Truque said that football players specifically had higher rates of MRSA colonization than other contact sport athletes, but that this could be a result of that sport making up the largest portion of the sample.

Clarence B. Creech 

C. Buddy Creech

“The first step, which is something we can all do right now that doesn’t require additional high-tech stuff or additional research, is really focusing on some of those very basic infection prevention things that we know already work,” C. Buddy Creech, MD, MPH, of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and member of the Infectious Diseases in Children Editorial Board, said during the press conference. – by David Muoio

For more information:

Jimenez-Truque N. Abstract 298. Presented at: IDWeek 2014; Oct. 8-12, 2014; Philadelphia.

Disclosure: One researcher reported serving as a grant investigator and scientific advisor for Novartis.