August 05, 2014
3 min read
Save

Certain factors predicative of renal scarring after first UTI

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Children with a urinary tract infection who have abnormal renal ultrasonographic results or a high fever and an etiological organism other than Escherichia coli have a high risk for renal scarring.

Perspective from Ellen R. Wald, MD

Nader Shaikh, MD, MPH, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in Pittsburgh, and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of patient data from cohort studies of children who underwent renal scanning with technetium Tc 99m succimer (dimercaptosuccinic acid) at least 5 months after their first urinary tract infection (UTI). Studies with positive urine culture results were included, those with neonatal cohorts were excluded. Nine studies were included in the analysis, yielding a study cohort of 1,280 children.

Most of study participants were younger than 24 months. Approximately 48% had a temperature of at least 39°C and 8.4% of infections were from an organism other than E. coli, according to the study data.

An estimated 20% of children had an abnormal renal ultrasonographic; 29.1% of children had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR); and 4.1% had VUR of grades IV to V.

Of the 199 children (15.5%) with renal scarring, 100 (50.3%) had VUR. The proportion of children with renal scarring increased as the grade of VUR increased.

Risk factors for renal scarring, listed in descending significance, includeed grade IV or V VUR; abnormal ultrasonographic finding; grade III VUR; C-reactive protein level of more than 40 mg/L; temperature of at least 39°C; organism other than E. coli; and grade I or II VUR.

To identify variables predictive of renal scarring through univariate analysis, researchers developed and compared three increasingly invasive strategies for evaluating a first-diagnosed UTI in children. Model 1 included routinely collected information, including history, exam results, and renal ultrasonographic findings. Model 2 included all information in model 1 plus serum inflammatory markers. Model 3 included everything in model 2 plus information on the presence and degree of VUR.

A model 1 score of 2 or more had a sensitivity of 44.9% and specificity of 82.4%. A model 1 score of 2 or more predicted 68.2% of patients with a grade IV or V VUR. Subanalysis of models 2 and 3 was limited due to small sample size, but in general appeared less significant than model one, according to researchers.

“Because we included studies that were conducted at a time when [voiding cystourethrogram] was routinely recommended, we were able to assess the additional predictive ability of three increasingly invasive models. We found that using a simple model with only three clinical variables provided a reasonable screening strategy…. Early identification of children at risk for renal scarring using the prediction rules developed in this study could help clinicians deliver specific treatment and follow-up for this small subgroup in the future,” the researchers concluded.

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.