Certain factors predicative of renal scarring after first UTI
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Children with a urinary tract infection who have abnormal renal ultrasonographic results or a high fever and an etiological organism other than Escherichia coli have a high risk for renal scarring.
Nader Shaikh, MD, MPH, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in Pittsburgh, and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of patient data from cohort studies of children who underwent renal scanning with technetium Tc 99m succimer (dimercaptosuccinic acid) at least 5 months after their first urinary tract infection (UTI). Studies with positive urine culture results were included, those with neonatal cohorts were excluded. Nine studies were included in the analysis, yielding a study cohort of 1,280 children.
Most of study participants were younger than 24 months. Approximately 48% had a temperature of at least 39°C and 8.4% of infections were from an organism other than E. coli, according to the study data.
An estimated 20% of children had an abnormal renal ultrasonographic; 29.1% of children had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR); and 4.1% had VUR of grades IV to V.
Of the 199 children (15.5%) with renal scarring, 100 (50.3%) had VUR. The proportion of children with renal scarring increased as the grade of VUR increased.
Risk factors for renal scarring, listed in descending significance, includeed grade IV or V VUR; abnormal ultrasonographic finding; grade III VUR; C-reactive protein level of more than 40 mg/L; temperature of at least 39°C; organism other than E. coli; and grade I or II VUR.
To identify variables predictive of renal scarring through univariate analysis, researchers developed and compared three increasingly invasive strategies for evaluating a first-diagnosed UTI in children. Model 1 included routinely collected information, including history, exam results, and renal ultrasonographic findings. Model 2 included all information in model 1 plus serum inflammatory markers. Model 3 included everything in model 2 plus information on the presence and degree of VUR.
A model 1 score of 2 or more had a sensitivity of 44.9% and specificity of 82.4%. A model 1 score of 2 or more predicted 68.2% of patients with a grade IV or V VUR. Subanalysis of models 2 and 3 was limited due to small sample size, but in general appeared less significant than model one, according to researchers.
“Because we included studies that were conducted at a time when [voiding cystourethrogram] was routinely recommended, we were able to assess the additional predictive ability of three increasingly invasive models. We found that using a simple model with only three clinical variables provided a reasonable screening strategy…. Early identification of children at risk for renal scarring using the prediction rules developed in this study could help clinicians deliver specific treatment and follow-up for this small subgroup in the future,” the researchers concluded.
Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.