April 09, 2014
3 min read
Save

ART programs in low-resource settings in need of TB diagnostic tools

Antiretroviral therapy programs in low- and middle-income countries are still in need of tuberculosis diagnostic tools to help identify tuberculosis in children with HIV, according to recent study findings published in the Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.

Perspective from Jeffrey R. Starke, MD

Lukas Fenner, MD, MSc, of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute in Basel, Switzerland, and colleagues evaluated 43 ART programs that treated patients in 23 countries to determine the types of TB screening and diagnosis practices among children who were HIV-positive. Nearly 26% of the programs treated children only, and 74.4% treated both adults and children. More than half of the sites were tertiary teaching or referral hospitals (55.8%) vs. secondary, district or provincial hospitals (14%), and primary health care centers or clinics (30.2%). Most sites were urban (79.1%), followed by peri-urban (16.3%) and rural (4.6%).

Lukas Fenner

All of the sites had sputum microscopy and chest radiograph available for the diagnosis of TB, followed by mycobacterial culture at 93%, gastric aspiration at 62.8%, tuberculin skin testing in 60.5%, induced sputum in 53.5% and Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid) in 37.2%. Of the programs with direct access to pediatric TB diagnostic tools, 79.1% had radiographs, 72.1% had access to sputum microscopy, 44.2% to tuberculin skin test, 20.9% to mycobacterial culture and 20.9% to Xpert MTB/RIF.

Forty-one sites used both contact history and weight loss as screening practices to rule out active TB. Other screening practices used were fever screening (88.4%); cough screening (83.7%); chest radiograph (79.1%); sputum microscopy (58.1%); gastric aspiration (34.9%); tuberculin skin test (34.9%); mycobacterial culture (27.9%); and induced sputum microscopy (14%).

Fourteen sites used a treatment regimen of 2 months on isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide, followed by 4 months on isoniazid and rifampicin, whereas 18 sites did not have specific regimens.

“Childhood TB diagnostic tools are still infrequently available or used in pediatric ART programs of low- and middle-income countries,” Fenner told Infectious Diseases in Children. “The scale-up of highly sensitive molecular diagnostics such as Xpert MTB/RIF, alone or in combination with additional diagnostics, needs to be reinforced, and may become a key element in ART programs caring for HIV-infected children in high TB prevalence settings.” — by Amber Cox

Lukas Fenner, MD, MSc, can be reached at lukas.fenner@unibas.ch.

Disclosure: See the study for a full list of disclosures.