Read more

December 28, 2021
1 min read
Save

Switching patients with glaucoma to SITA Faster may improve test performance

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster may improve visual field performance in moderate to advanced glaucoma but may conceal disease progression, according to a retrospective, longitudinal study.

Perspective from Derek MacDonald, OD, FAAO

The study, published in Ophthalmology, assessed eyes with glaucoma to determine the effect of switching from Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard to SITA Faster on visual field (VF) performance in a large range of glaucoma severity.

“We found that eyes that transition from SITA Standard to SITA Faster in a real-world clinical setting, on average, demonstrate an improvement in VF performance (MD) depending on disease severity,” Alex T. Pham, BS, and colleagues wrote. “In particular, eyes that have moderate and severe disease demonstrate a greater increase in MD when transitioned to SITA Faster compared with eyes that have mild disease, which, on average, demonstrate no change.”

The study included 766 eyes of 421 patients at the Wilmer Eye Institute Glaucoma Center of Excellence between 2018 and 2020. Researchers used a temporal sequence of testing strategies, which consisted of two SITA Standards followed by SITA Faster, with a mean time of 13.9 months between each test to “investigate the effect of testing sequence on eye-level VF performance for different stages of glaucoma severity.”

Mean deviation (MD) between the second and first VF in the sequence, either Standard-Standard or Standard-Faster, was studied to detect significant longitudinal deterioration.

SITA-Faster was 52.91% shorter than SITA Standard.

There was 0.87 dB improvement in MD change with Standard-Faster compared with Standard-Standard in eyes with moderate glaucoma and an improvement of 1.49 dB in eyes with advanced glaucoma. There was no significant difference in mild glaucoma.

There were more false positive errors seen in SITA Faster (6.82%) compared with SITA Standard (4.81%; P < .01) as well as more seeding point errors in SITA Faster (39.03%) compared with SITA Standard (27.28%; P < 01).

“Our results indicate that transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster is associated with improved VF performance in eyes with moderate and advanced glaucoma but no difference in VF performance in eyes with mild glaucoma,” Pham and colleagues wrote. “Overall, changing testing strategies from SITA Standard to SITA Faster may obscure the detection of worsening disease in those with more severe stages of glaucoma at baseline, and clinicians should consider this effect when implementing this transition.”