Read more

November 03, 2021
1 min read
Save

Oxidative contact lens disinfectants effectively inactivate COVID-19 surrogates

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

BOSTON – Oxidative contact lens disinfection systems showed significant ability to inactivate two seasonal coronavirus surrogates for COVID-19, according to a study being presented at the American Academy of Optometry annual meeting.

“With COVID-19, several questions regarding its transmission have emerged, such as if it’s possible to get COVID-19 through ocular exposure,” Christiane L. Nogueira, PhD, from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada, said during an academy-sponsored press conference. “Although ocular complications are not a frequent manifestation of coronavirus infections in humans, there are several studies showing that ocular exposure may represent a potential route of entry for SARS-CoV-2.”

Nogueira noted that, because of this, wearers of contact lenses may be at an increased risk for developing COVID-19, especially those who wear reusable contact lenses.

To assess the efficacy of contact lens care products against viruses, Nogueira and colleagues exposed the HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43 coronaviruses to three nonoxidative systems and three oxidative systems for periods of 4 hours and 6 hours.

The nonoxidative products included Biotrue (Bausch + Lomb), Boston Simplus (Bausch + Lomb) and Opti-Free PureMoist (Alcon). The oxidative products included Clear Care (Alcon), cleadew and cleadew GP (Ophtecs).

For HCoV-229E, results showed that the nonoxidative systems did not show a significant log 10 reduction compared with the reductions seen in the oxidative system tests (all P < .001). Both cleadew and cleadew GP had a higher disinfection efficacy than Clear Care (all P .001).

Similarly for HCoV-OC43, the nonoxidative systems were not significantly effective, whereas the oxidative systems were (all P < .001).

“This study showed that nonoxidative disinfecting systems showed minimal to no ability to inactivate HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43; however, oxidative disinfecting systems showed significant virucidal activity against HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43,” Nogueira concluded.