Read more

August 30, 2021
2 min read
Save

Netarsudil lowers IOP when added to other treatments

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Netarsudil maintained IOP control and provided IOP-lowering efficacy when added to other treatments for patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, according to findings published in Current Medical Research and Opinion.

Perspective from Lisa M. Young, OD, FAAO

“Elevated IOP is associated with increased risk for progression of visual field loss in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), and pharmacotherapy to reduce IOP delays progression. The treatment goal for OAG/OHT patients in clinical practice is to lower IOP to the point that subsequent damage to the optic nerve is prevented, without sacrificing safety or convenience,” Fiaz Zamon, MD, ophthalmologist at Houston Eye Associates in Texas, and colleagues wrote.

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the IOP-lowering efficacy of netarsudil in real-world clinical settings when used as monotherapy or concomitantly with other IOP-lowering agents in patients with elevated IOP due to OAG or OHT,” the authors stated.

In a multicenter, prospective, interventional, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial, Zamon and colleagues analyzed data from 261 adults aged 18 and older with OAG or OHT. The study took place at 22 clinical sites in the U.S. for a duration of 12 weeks.

Researchers instructed all participants to use one daily drop of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% in addition to treatment regimens determined by the investigators. Participants visited the clinical sites three times over 12 weeks: baseline visit (day 0), follow-up visit at week 6 (±7 days) and a final visit at week 12 (±7 days). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage reduction from baseline IOP at week 12.

One patient dropped out of the study before taking medication. Of the remaining 260 participants, 99 received netarsudil as monotherapy (mean age, 67.2; 62.6% women; 12.1% Hispanic or Latino; 24% Black; 74% white) and 161 received netarsudil with concomitant therapy (mean age, 67.2; 60.3% women; 5.3% Hispanic or Latino; 29.8% Black; 67.6% white). Before the final visit, 41 additional patients dropped out, including 29 who experienced adverse events.

Of the original 261 participants, 242 received one or more netarsudil doses and had one or more follow-up IOP measurements.

Researchers found that IOP lowered by 16.9% in patients using netarsudil as monotherapy. Additionally, they noticed reductions in mean IOP among subgroups who added netarsudil to a single agent (4.3 ± 2.88 mm Hg; 20.5%) or two or more classes of concomitant therapy (4.5 ± 4.08 mm Hg; 20.9%) and who used netarsudil to replace one or more other drug classes (0.4 ± 2.47 mm Hg; 1.7%).

The limitations of this study include the open-label design, the lack of a comparator group and the potential for improved medication adherence during the study participation prior to enrollment.

“In the real-world treatment of patients with OAG or OHT, netarsudil consistently maintained IOP control when it replaced previous IOP-lowering therapies and provided additional IOP-lowering efficacy when added to other treatments,” Zamon and colleagues wrote. “The introduction of netarsudil treatment as monotherapy or an adjunct to other topical treatments achieved clinically meaningful reductions in IOP, and the replacement of prior agents with netarsudil resulted in IOP control comparable to levels obtainable with established treatments such as prostaglandin analogs.”

The authors concluded that the benefits and safety of netarsudil translate to the real world.