Makoto Aihara, MD, PhD, of the University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku’s department of ophthalmology, and colleagues analyzed data from a phase 3, randomized, investigator-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, noninferiority study.
They stratified patients into groups receiving omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) 0.002% or 0.005% once daily during a 4-week period. Investigators measured IOP at 9 a.m., 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. at weeks 1, 2 and 4.
Change in mean diurnal IOP at week 4 from baseline served as the primary endpoint, the researchers wrote. The noninferiority margin for OMDI vs. latanoprost was 1.5 mm Hg.
Of 190 patients, 189 had at least one post-baseline IOP measurement. At baseline, patients receiving OMDI or latanoprost had a mean diurnal IOP of 23.78 mm Hg and 23.4 mm Hg, respectively.
At week 4, least-squares mean reduction in IOP from baseline for OMDI was –5.93 mm Hg compared with –6.56 mm Hg for latanoprost (95% CI, 0.01–1.26), the researchers wrote.
The most frequently reported adverse events included conjunctival hyperemia (24.5% for OMDI vs. 10.4% for latanoprost) and corneal thickening (11.7% vs. 1%). Investigators observed punctate keratitis only in the latanoprost group (5.2%).
“OMDI had an acceptable safety rating and tolerability profile, as no serious treatment-related adverse events were reported, and there were no discontinuations related to the treatment,” the researchers wrote. “OMDI could, therefore, be considered a candidate for first-line treatment of glaucoma and (ocular hypertension).”