We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.
Researchers suggest that virtual clinics offer a safe, logistically viable option for certain patients with glaucoma due to the low rate of adverse misclassification and the slow progression of most glaucoma, pending regular patient reassessment.
A total of 204 patients from a virtual glaucoma clinic were included in this study. Subsequent face-to-face clinical assessment was completed by a glaucoma consultant or fellow. Proformas were reviewed remotely by one of two additional glaucoma consultants and 12 months later by the clinicians who had undertaken the original clinical examination.
Researchers identified adverse disagreement between face-to-face and virtual review in 7 of 204 cases (3.4%), in which virtual review failed to predict a need to accelerate follow-up identified in face-to-face review.
Misclassification events were rare, according to researchers, at 1.9% of assessments.
The primary diagnoses were: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in 88 patients, primary ocular hypertension in 59 patients, glaucoma suspects in 33 patients, secondary glaucoma in 18 patients, secondary ocular hypertension in four patients and primary angle closure in two patients.
Following face-to-face assessment, 21 patients were identified as being “unstable” and required a change in management, researchers said.
Researchers found that the virtual clinic has low sensitivity at detecting unstable disease. – by Abigail Sutton
Disclosure: The researchers reported no relevant financial disclosures.
We’re sorry, but an unexpected error has occurred.
Please refresh your browser and try again. If this error persists, please contact ITSupport@wyanokegroup.com for assistance.
Would you like to receive email reminders to complete your saved activities from Healio CME?
Activity saved! You'll receive reminders to complete your saved activities from Healio CME.