June 20, 2016
2 min read
Save

Latanoprostene bunod once daily found noninferior to timolol three times daily

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Researchers found that daily evening treatments of latanoprostene bunod were noninferior to timolol twice daily for 3 months and resulted in significantly greater IOP lowering in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, according to a study in the American Journal of Ophthalmology. 

Perspective from Blair Lonsberry, OD, FAAO

This phase 3 study compared the IOP-lowering effect of latanoprostene bunod (LBN) 0.024% instilled once daily in the evening with timolol maleate 0.5% instilled twice daily in those with open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension, at 46 U.S. sites.

The primary efficacy endpoint was IOP in the study eye measured at the time points of 8 a.m., 12 p.m. and 4 p.m. at each post-randomized visit of week 2, week 6 and month 3.

Mean IOP was significantly lower in the LBN group than in the timolol group at the majority of timepoints measured, according to researchers.

LBN was also considered statistically superior over timolol at all time points except the 8 a.m. time point at week 2.

The LBN group exhibited consistently higher IOP reduction of at least 25% at all time points compared with the timolol group.

In addition, LBN treatment resulted in a greater overall reduction in mean diurnal IOP than timolol 0.5% over the course of the study, the researchers wrote.

“LBN was well tolerated overall and exhibited a safety profile typical of topical prostaglandin analog therapy,” they concluded. – by Abigail Sutton

Disclosure: Medeiros received institutional grant money from the National Eye Institute, Allergan, Alcon and Bausch + Lomb and has also served as a paid consultant for Allergan, Alcon, Reichert, Carl Zeiss Meditec and Heidelberg Engineering. Please see the full study for all remaining authors’ relevant financial disclosures.