Read more

March 10, 2022
3 min read
Save

Social risk factors ‘heavily influence’ racial disparities in cancer surgical care

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Black Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective cancer surgery had higher rates of mortality than their white counterparts, irrespective of neighborhood deprivation or dual eligibility status, according to study results.

The findings, presented at Society of Surgical Oncology International 2022 Conference on Surgical Cancer Care, also showed a more pronounced effect of race among those with more resources, and associations of high deprivation levels with higher mortality among both white and Black beneficiaries.

Quote by Sidra Bonner, MD, MPH.

“One of the more interesting findings in our study was that neighborhood-level poverty was more strongly associated with mortality than individual-level poverty, measured by dual eligibility in our cohort for both Black and white patients,” Sidra Bonner, MD, MPH, general surgery resident at University of Michigan, told Healio. “We additionally found that the disparity in mortality between Black and white patients occurred among those living in the most deprived neighborhoods and who were dual-eligible. The fact that the disparity was wider among beneficiaries with more resources suggests that socioeconomic status at the individual and community level does not account for the entirety of the racial disparity.”

Rationale

Although racial disparities in mortality and other outcomes after cancer surgery have been well-documented, few studies have examined social factors that may contribute to the persistent inequities, Bonner said.

“Ultimately, the identification of the interaction of social factors that may put a given patient at risk for worst postoperative outcomes allows for better identification of the most at-risk patients for interventions,” she said.

Bonner added that CMS has made elimination of racial and ethnic disparities and achievement of health equity a strategic priority over the next decade, which has implications for quality measurement and payments.

“Therefore, it is very likely that surgeons, surgical practices and hospitals will increasingly be held accountable for disparities in their outcomes,” she said.

Methods

Bonner and colleagues used 100% Medicare inpatient claims to identify Medicare beneficiaries who had elective pancreatic, lung, colon and rectal cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2018.

The researchers verified dual Medicare/Medicaid enrollment using Medicare data. They stratified beneficiaries, who self-identified as Black or white, into quartiles based on their neighborhood Area Deprivation Index score, a combined measure of census tract-level housing, education and employment.

To assess the association of race, neighborhood deprivation and dual eligibility (Medicare and Medicaid) with 30-day mortality, the investigators employed logistic regression after risk adjustment for sex, age, comorbidities and type of procedure.

Results

Results showed Black beneficiaries with dual eligibility from neighborhoods with the highest deprivation levels had the highest probability of mortality (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.34-4.98). The largest difference in mortality between Black vs. white beneficiaries occurred among those without dual eligibility who lived in areas with low deprivation levels (2.3%; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4 vs. 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.5-1.8). Researchers observed a smaller difference in mortality between Black vs. white beneficiaries with dual eligibility in areas with high deprivation levels (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.9-4.3 vs. 3.7%; 95% CI 2.9-4.3).

Black beneficiaries had a higher probability of mortality across all combinations of neighborhood deprivation and dual-eligibility status.

Implications, next steps

“Persistent racial disparities in surgical care are heavily influenced by modifiable social risk factors,” Bonner told Healio. “Meaningful interventions to address social risk among patients will not improve outcomes for all but may help reduce racial inequities in care.”

Bonner added that surgeons and health care systems must consider social risk just as they do medical risk.

“Patients should have social risk factors optimized during the phases of surgical care to improve overall outcomes,” she said.

The next phase of research should focus on interventions to reduce and eliminate disparities in cancer surgical care, according to Bonner.

“Most of the implementation work around racial disparities has centered on medical diagnoses, such as heart failure, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” she said. “Identifying and studying multilevel interventions that leverage electronic health record data and alerts, telehealth, nurse coordinators, and connections with community-based resources to target and address the most socially-at risk patients undergoing surgery could be considered as first steps.”