December 05, 2018
3 min read
Save

Once-weekly, conventional breast radiotherapy yield similarly low long-term adverse effects

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Women with early breast cancer who received once-weekly, hypofractionated radiotherapy exhibited low rates of normal tissue effects comparable to those of conventional radiation therapy at 10 years, according to study findings presented at American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting.

Perspective from Rahul Tendulkar, MD

“This study says it’s possible to find a regimen that would allow early-stage breast cancer patients to be treated only once a week over 5 weeks rather than daily over the same time period,” Murray Brunt, MD, professor of clinical oncology at University Hospitals of North Midlands and Keele University in the U.K., said in a press release. “Findings should help doctors discuss risks and benefits with their patients for various courses of radiation therapy and inform shared decision-making between physicians and patients.”

In the U.K. FAST trial, researchers evaluated 915 women aged 50 years and older with invasive breast carcinoma (pT1-2 pN0) who were recruited from 18 centers in the U.K. between 2004 and 2007. Researchers randomly assigned patients 1:1:1 to one of three whole-breast radiotherapy schedules: 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, 30 Gy in five fractions over 5 weeks or 28.5 Gy in five fractions over 5 weeks.

Patients scheduled to undergo lymphatic/breast boost radiotherapy or neoadjuvant cytotoxic therapy were excluded from the analysis.

Clinicians assessed normal tissue effects (NTE) annually for 10 years, comparing photographs taken at 2 and 5 years with pre-radiotherapy baseline assessment.

The study’s composite endpoint was any clinician-evaluated NTE. Recurrence of breast tumors served as a secondary endpoint.
clinician-assessed breast NTE was significantly higher at 5 and 10 years for the 30 Gy group vs. the 50 Gy group ( P= .008), but the difference in late NTE effects between the 50 Gy group and the 28.5 Gy group was not statistically significant.

At both 5 and 10 years, there was a very low prevalence of marked NTE.

Compared with 50 Gy, excess of moderate/marked NTE among the 30 Gy group included: 10.5% (95% CI,4.9-16.1) at 5 years and +9.4% (95% CI, 1.1-17.6) at 10 years.

For 28.5 Gy, excess of moderate/marked effects were 2.4% (95% CI, -2.5-7.3) at 5 years and 5.5% (95% CI, -2.3-13.3) at 10 years.

A total of 10 local recurrences (three with 50 Gy and 30 Gy each, and four with 28.5 Gy) and 96 deaths (33 at 50 Gy, 33 at 30 Gy, and 30 at 28.5 Gy) were reported at 9.9 years’ follow-up.

PAGE BREAK

“The profile of adverse effects to normal breast tissue was similar between the 28.5 Gy and 50 Gy groups, but rates were higher after 30 Gy given in five fractions over 5 weeks,” Brunt said in the press release. “This disparity is rooted in differences between the two regimens in fractionation sensitivity.”

The researchers are now investigating a radiotherapy course of five fractions over five consecutive days.

“A schedule like this would have significant clinical and practical implications, such as allowing radiation therapy to be integrated more closely with surgery and other therapies,” Brunt said.– by Jennifer Byrne

Reference:

Brunt M, et al. Abstract LBA2. Presented at: American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; Oct. 21-24, 2018; San Antonio.

Disclosures : The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.