July 18, 2018
3 min read
Save

Sacituzumab govitecan appears safe, effective in heavily pretreated breast cancer subtype

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH
Aditya Bardia

Treatment with sacituzumab govitecan, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, resulted in objective responses among women with heavily pretreated hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer, according to findings presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting.

Perspective from Adam M. Brufsky, MD, PhD

The adverse events observed with sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132, Immunomedics) were tolerable and similar to those observed in earlier reports.

“Sacituzumab govitecan is a novel antibody-drug conjugate consisting of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, conjugated to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblastic antigen-2, which is highly expressed in many epithelial cancers,” the researchers wrote. “A phase I/II basket trial investigated its activity in patients with advanced cancers. Results in HR-positive, HER-2-negative [patients with metastatic breast cancer] who had ≥1 prior hormonal therapy are presented here.”

Aditya Bardia, MD (MBBS), MPH, assistant professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, and colleagues enrolled 54 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer in this phase 1/2 basket trial. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older, with measurable disease and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1, and had received treatment with one or more prior therapies.

The median age of patients in this all-female cohort was 54 (range, 33-79). An ECOG performance status of 1 was reported in 56% of patients and almost all (98%) had received one or more prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. All patients (100%) had had received treatment with hormonal therapy for metastatic disease; 67% of patients had received 3 or more lines of hormonal therapy. Taxanes and anthracyclines in any setting were reported in 93% and 69% of patients, respectively.

Sacituzumab govitecan 10 mg/kg was administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity, with restaging scans every 8 weeks. The researchers assessed response to treatment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and safety.

All patients received at least 1 dose of sacituzumab govitecan. The median number of doses provided was 11 (range, 1-74) and the median duration of treatment was 4 months (range, 0.2-26 months).

At the time of presentation, 23 patients had died; 1 patient was lost to follow-up at 5.3 months and 1 patient was missing, according to the study results. Of the 29 patients in long-term follow-up, 10 remained on treatment; 7 of those 10 patients achieved a partial response and the other 3 had stable disease.

Median duration of response to sacituzumab govitecan was 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.4-18.3 months). Median time to onset of response was 2.3 months (range, 1.5-7.8 months). Median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.6-8.9 months).

The objective response rate, as determined by RECIST 1.1 criteria, was 31% (n = 17). Seventeen patients achieved a partial response; there were no complete responses. The clinical benefit rate of sacituzumab govitecan, as measured by complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease for greater than or equal to 6 months, was 48% (n = 26).

None of the reported study deaths were attributed to sacituzumab govitecan. Adverse events were managed with additional medication or dosing changes; 28% of patients also received growth factor support.

“Sacituzumab govitecan as a single agent demonstrated significant clinical activity in heavily pre-treated [patients with HR-positive, HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer],” the researchers wrote, with a “predictable and manageable safety profile.”

“Additional studies, including rational combinations, are currently being evaluated for metastatic breast cancer and other metastatic epithelial cancers.” – by Julia Ernst, MS

Reference:

Bardia A, et al. Abstract 1004. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 1-5, 2018; Chicago.

Disclosure: Bardia reports serving in a consultant or advisory role for bioTheranostics, Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer and Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Please see the study for all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.