Read more

May 18, 2018
3 min read
Save

Combination immunotherapy, chemotherapy feasible in metastatic bladder cancer

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Matthew Galsky, MD
Matthew Galsky

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint blockade and chemotherapy appeared feasible for some patients with metastatic bladder cancer, study data showed.

Perspective from

“Because chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the two pillars of treatment for metastatic bladder cancer, we sought to better understand how these treatments might be best given together,” Matthew Galsky, MD, director of genitourinary medical oncology and professor of urology, medicine and medical oncology at Tisch Cancer Institute at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, said in a press release. “Already the results of this trial have inspired the creation of two more trials that seek to better the treatment of [patients with bladder cancer] by combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy.”

The researchers performed a multicenter, single-arm phase 2 study of 36 chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Galsky and colleagues conducted peripheral blood flow cytometry on all patients, and whole exome sequencing of archival tumor tissue on 28 patients. All patients received two cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin, followed by another four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin plus ipilimumab (Yervoy, Bristol-Myers Squibb).

OS at 1 year served as the main endpoint. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate and PFS.

Patients demonstrated an ORR of 69%, with 17% of patients achieving complete response.

The 1-year OS rate was 61% (lower bound 90% CI, 51%), and median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI, 10.5-23.4). Median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.9).

More than three-quarters of patients (81%) experienced adverse events of grade 3 or higher, most of which were hematologic. The most common grade 3 or worse immune-related adverse event was diarrhea (11%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin alone did not appear to produce any significant changes in the composition and frequency of circulating immune cells, according to an exploratory analysis, but the addition of ipilimumab appeared to significantly expand circulating CD4 cells which, in turn, correlated with improved survival.

Researchers also noted response rate appeared significantly higher among patients with deleterious somatic mutations in DNA damage response genes (P = .03). All ten patients with these deleterious mutations achieved a partial or complete response (sensitivity, 47.6%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 38.9%).

“Our work is an example of using genomics to enable precision medicine,” Andrew V. Uzilov, PhD, a co-author of the study and director of cancer genomics for Sema4, said in the release. “By looking for loss-of-function mutations in DNA damage repair genes, we may be able to predict who will do well on a combined chemotherapy plus immunotherapy regimen. In our study, we looked at a pool of 55 DNA damage repair genes as predictive biomarkers. We are now exploring further which of these genes, and what types of mutations within them, best predict treatment response, as well as the interplay of DNA damage repair status with other predictors of immunotherapy response.”

The researchers acknowledged that the study was limited by the single-arm design and small sample size. – by Andy Polhamus

 

Disclosures: Galsky reports advisory roles with AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Merck and Pfizer, as well as research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck. The other authors report no relevant financial disclosures.