January 25, 2018
2 min read
Save

Rituximab maintenance demonstrates survival benefit after chemotherapy in lymphoma subtype

ATLANTA — Rituximab maintenance after rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in first-line treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma who were not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation, according to results from a long-term follow-up study presented at the ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition.

Previously, in 2004, the European MCL Network performed the MCL Elderly trial for the first-line treatment of patients with MCL aged 60 years or older and not suitable for ASCT.

The primary analysis demonstrated that rituximab (Rituxan; Genentech, Biogen) plus FC chemotherapy did not improve complete remission rates when compared with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy. Additionally, the initial results demonstrated a prolonged PFS in patients in remission with the use of rituximab maintenance when compared with interferon-alpha maintenance.

Eva Hoster, PhD, of the Medical Center of the University of Munich, and colleagues presented long-term follow-up of the time-to-event endpoints after a median follow-up of 6.7 years.

Failure-free survival after the start of rituximab plus FC chemotherapy or rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy induction overlapped with 5-year probabilities of 31% in each group.

The long-term follow-up results also demonstrated that although rituximab plus FC chemotherapy demonstrated a reduction in 5-year cumulative incidence of treatment failure compared with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy (51% vs. 60%), the cumulative incidence of death without treatment failure was greater with rituximab plus FC chemotherapy (19% vs. 9%).

OS was shorter after rituximab plus FC chemotherapy with a 5-year probability of 42% (36%-49%) compared with 58% (51%-64%) after rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy.

Additionally, rituximab maintenance after first-line treatment significantly prolonged PFS from the end of induction when compared with interferon-alpha maintenance (P = .0109). Median 5-year PFS with rituximab was 53% compared with 23% with interferon-alpha maintenance.

Five-year PFS with rituximab maintenance was 51% vs. 22% with interferon-alpha maintenance after initial response to rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy (P < .0001).

Additionally, 5-year OS was significantly prolonged in rituximab maintenance (79%) compared with interferon-alpha maintenance (59%) after rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy.

However, rituximab maintenance after rituximab plus FC chemotherapy had a significantly reduced 5-year OS (57%).

After 5 years of follow-up, 32% of patients (n = 82) receiving rituximab maintenance after rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy remained on treatment. Thirty-three percent had to stop treatment early. More than half (58%) of patients (n = 83) receiving interferon-alpha maintenance had stopped treatment early after 5 years, while only 5% remained on therapy.

PAGE BREAK

“Six cycles of rituximab plus FC chemotherapy is effective in terms of ... activity, but it was shown to be too toxic for application in the first-line treatment,” Hoster said during her presentation. “We can also clearly see that rituximab maintenance is effective after first-line treatment of rituximab plus FC chemotherapy, but, we see that it is [also] too toxic. [However], eight cycles of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance is effective with good long-term outcomes.” – by Ryan McDonald

Reference:

Hoster E, et al. Abstract 153. Presented at: ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec. 9-12, 2017; Atlanta.

Disclosures: Hoster reports research funding and travel support from Roche.