April 25, 2016
3 min read
Save

Many women qualify for breast cancer screening before recommended age

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Half of women aged 40 to 44 years had an elevated risk for breast cancer and qualified for screening earlier than the recommended age of 45 years, according to an institutional database review presented at the American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting.

A formal risk assessment is necessary to identify women who would qualify for early mammography, screening MRIs and genetics testing, according to the researchers.

“Many women do not focus on breast cancer issues until they begin regular mammograms. As a result, women may remain unaware that screening at an earlier age is important for their health,” Kevin Hughes, MS, FACS, co-director of Avon Foundation Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, as well as medical director of the Bermuda Cancer Genetics and Risk Assessment Clinic and associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School, said in a press release.

American Cancer Society guidelines updated in 2015 adjusted the recommended age for average-risk women to commence screening from 40 years to 45 years. Women with an elevated risk should begin screening prior to that age.

The American Society of Breast Surgeons 2015 guidelines also recommend screening mammograms for women with a lifetime breast cancer risk of 15% to 20%, with MRI recommended for women if their risk is 20% or higher.

“The new guidelines are a bit of a catch 22," Hughes said. “Certain conditions will only become clear through mammography and related procedures now recommended to start at age 45. Few women undergo risk assessment, which can be complex and time-consuming and involves information such as a women's child-bearing history, age of first menstrual cycle and family members diagnosed with cancer.”

In their specialty practice at Massachusetts General Hospital, Hughes and colleagues aimed to identify the number of women aged 40 to 44 years who would meet eligibility requirements for screening mammograms, genetic testing and MRIs based on the new guidelines. Researchers determined if women had a 5% or greater chance of harboring a BRCA mutation using the Tyrer-Cuzick, Myriad or the BRCAPRO models, in addition to using National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

Researchers drew from a pool of 6,964 women aged 40 years or older who did not have a diagnosis of cancer and were seen as new patients at their practice. Of these women, 909 women were aged 40 to 44 years.

Overall, 39% (n = 352) of the younger cohort were deemed eligible to begin screening at age 40 years based on ACS criteria. An additional 11% (n = 103) were eligible for early screening by the American Society of Breast Surgeons guidelines.

“The number of women found to have above average risk between age 40 and 44 was extremely surprising, and the message is clear,” Hughes said. “Our study was large and comprehensive.”

Further, 127 (13.8%) women qualified for screening MRI, 59 (6.5%) were at risk for a suspected genetic mutation, and 166 (18.3%) qualified for both MRI and genetic testing.

“A growing body of evidence points to a similar conclusion: If your doctor adheres to the new recommendations for breast screening, actively seek out a formal risk assessment, whether or not it is specifically suggested, to make sure you receive the care you need,” Hughes said. “A formal risk assessment by a qualified physician is crucial before a doctor recommends delaying regular screening mammography until age 45."by Nick Andrews

Reference :

Hughes K, et al. Application of the 2015 ACS and ASBrS screening mammography guidelines: Risk assessment is critical for women ages 40-44. Presented at: American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting; April 13-17, 2016; Dallas, Texas.

Disclosure : HemOnc Today could not confirm the researchers’ relevant financial disclosures at the time of reporting.